FUJIY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kyocera has a net margin of 8.77% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of -3.6%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.29% beat Kyocera's return on equity of 1.45%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand Kyocera has an analysts' consensus of $11.40 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJIFILM Holdings has higher upside potential than Kyocera, analysts believe FUJIFILM Holdings is more attractive than Kyocera.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kyocera has a beta of 0.241, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.921%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. Kyocera offers a yield of 2.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Kyocera pays out 73.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than Kyocera quarterly revenues of $3.2B. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $467.1M is higher than Kyocera's net income of -$116.4M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while Kyocera's PE ratio is 50.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.15x versus 1.18x for Kyocera. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SBC Medical Group Holdings has a net margin of 8.77% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 5.34%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.29% beat SBC Medical Group Holdings's return on equity of 25.89%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand SBC Medical Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $10.00 which suggests that it could grow by 207.69%. Given that SBC Medical Group Holdings has higher upside potential than FUJIFILM Holdings, analysts believe SBC Medical Group Holdings is more attractive than FUJIFILM Holdings.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SBC Medical Group Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. SBC Medical Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. SBC Medical Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. FUJIFILM Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than SBC Medical Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $53.1M. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $467.1M is higher than SBC Medical Group Holdings's net income of $2.8M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while SBC Medical Group Holdings's PE ratio is 7.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.15x versus 1.50x for SBC Medical Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SECOM has a net margin of 8.77% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 9.53%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.29% beat SECOM's return on equity of 7.56%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand SECOM has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJIFILM Holdings has higher upside potential than SECOM, analysts believe FUJIFILM Holdings is more attractive than SECOM.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SECOM has a beta of 0.351, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.883%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. SECOM offers a yield of 1.75% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. SECOM pays out 39.71% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than SECOM quarterly revenues of $2B. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $467.1M is higher than SECOM's net income of $190.3M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while SECOM's PE ratio is 20.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.15x versus 2.74x for SECOM. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

THK has a net margin of 8.77% compared to FUJIFILM Holdings's net margin of 2.32%. FUJIFILM Holdings's return on equity of 8.29% beat THK's return on equity of 3.53%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a consensus price target of $11.30, signalling upside risk potential of 13.28%. On the other hand THK has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FUJIFILM Holdings has higher upside potential than THK, analysts believe FUJIFILM Holdings is more attractive than THK.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a beta of 0.422, which suggesting that the stock is 57.762% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison THK has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.478%.

FUJIFILM Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.83%. THK offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. FUJIFILM Holdings pays 23.07% of its earnings as a dividend. THK pays out 39.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FUJIFILM Holdings quarterly revenues are $5.3B, which are larger than THK quarterly revenues of $574.1M. FUJIFILM Holdings's net income of $467.1M is higher than THK's net income of $13.3M. Notably, FUJIFILM Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.70x while THK's PE ratio is 35.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FUJIFILM Holdings is 1.15x versus 1.33x for THK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.