EADSY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Embraer SA has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 6.66%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.94% beat Embraer SA's return on equity of 12.12%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Embraer SA has an analysts' consensus of $57.00 which suggests that it could grow by 11.68%. Given that Embraer SA has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe Embraer SA is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Embraer SA has a beta of 1.682, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 68.199%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. Embraer SA offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Airbus SE pays 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Embraer SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than Embraer SA quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Airbus SE's net income of $834.4M is higher than Embraer SA's net income of $73.4M. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.09x while Embraer SA's PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 1.97x versus 1.43x for Embraer SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 19.91%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.94% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 32.36%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $244.48 which suggests that it could grow by 3.36%. Given that GE Aerospace has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe GE Aerospace is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.389, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.852%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Airbus SE pays 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $9.9B. Airbus SE's net income of $834.4M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $2B. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.09x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 36.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 1.97x versus 6.49x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ICTS International NV has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of --. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.94% beat ICTS International NV's return on equity of 5.54%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand ICTS International NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Airbus SE has higher upside potential than ICTS International NV, analysts believe Airbus SE is more attractive than ICTS International NV.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ICTS International NV has a beta of 0.635, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.453%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. ICTS International NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Airbus SE pays 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. ICTS International NV pays out -76.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Airbus SE's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are larger than ICTS International NV quarterly revenues of --. Airbus SE's net income of $834.4M is higher than ICTS International NV's net income of --. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.09x while ICTS International NV's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 1.97x versus 0.31x for ICTS International NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RTX has a net margin of 5.86% compared to Airbus SE's net margin of 7.56%. Airbus SE's return on equity of 22.94% beat RTX's return on equity of 7.4%.

Airbus SE has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand RTX has an analysts' consensus of $142.61 which suggests that it could fall by -2.63%. Given that RTX has higher upside potential than Airbus SE, analysts believe RTX is more attractive than Airbus SE.

Airbus SE has a beta of 1.293, which suggesting that the stock is 29.286% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RTX has a beta of 0.629, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.116%.

Airbus SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.85 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.21%. RTX offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. Airbus SE pays 52.34% of its earnings as a dividend. RTX pays out 67.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Airbus SE quarterly revenues are $14.2B, which are smaller than RTX quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Airbus SE's net income of $834.4M is lower than RTX's net income of $1.5B. Notably, Airbus SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.09x while RTX's PE ratio is 42.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Airbus SE is 1.97x versus 2.41x for RTX. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.