CMWAY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cycclone has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat Cycclone's return on equity of --.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of $74.40, signalling downside risk potential of -36.69%. On the other hand Cycclone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Cycclone, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Cycclone.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycclone has a beta of 2.155, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 115.494%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Cycclone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Cycclone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cycclone quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than Cycclone's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while Cycclone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 11.15x versus -- for Cycclone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of 16.73%. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat IREN's return on equity of -3.18%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of $74.40, signalling downside risk potential of -36.69%. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $18.70 which suggests that it could grow by 79.85%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Commonwealth Bank of Australia, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Commonwealth Bank of Australia.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $144.8M. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 11.15x versus 5.72x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of $74.40, signalling downside risk potential of -36.69%. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.096%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 22.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 11.15x versus 12.16x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net margin of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's return on equity of 13.22% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a consensus price target of $74.40, signalling downside risk potential of -36.69%. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Commonwealth Bank of Australia has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Commonwealth Bank of Australia is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a beta of 1.304, which suggesting that the stock is 30.393% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.508%.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia has a quarterly dividend of $1.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.67%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Commonwealth Bank of Australia pays 81.15% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Commonwealth Bank of Australia quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Commonwealth Bank of Australia's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Commonwealth Bank of Australia's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.81x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Commonwealth Bank of Australia is 11.15x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.