CMSQY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cycclone has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Cycclone's return on equity of --.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cycclone has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Cycclone, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Cycclone.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cycclone has a beta of 2.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 124.697%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Cycclone offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Cycclone pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Cycclone quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Cycclone's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while Cycclone's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 5.10x versus -- for Cycclone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of 16.73%. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat IREN's return on equity of -3.18%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $18.52 which suggests that it could grow by 109.06%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Computershare.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $144.8M. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 5.10x versus 4.88x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 10.68%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Macquarie Group.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.441, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.098%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $2.40 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 58.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 21.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 5.10x versus 11.67x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.

Computershare has a beta of 0.563, which suggesting that the stock is 43.73% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.853%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.74%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 5.10x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.