BYDDY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

China Automotive Systems has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of 3.35%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat China Automotive Systems's return on equity of 8.37%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Automotive Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 90.36%. Given that China Automotive Systems has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe China Automotive Systems is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Automotive Systems has a beta of 2.352, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 135.155%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. China Automotive Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. China Automotive Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than China Automotive Systems quarterly revenues of $164.2M. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than China Automotive Systems's net income of $5.5M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.98x while China Automotive Systems's PE ratio is 3.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.04x versus 0.19x for China Automotive Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

H World Group has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of 19.76%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat H World Group's return on equity of 29.15%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand H World Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.27 which suggests that it could grow by 39.22%. Given that H World Group has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe H World Group is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison H World Group has a beta of 0.712, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.788%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. H World Group offers a yield of 3.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. H World Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than H World Group quarterly revenues of $899.7M. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than H World Group's net income of $177.8M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.98x while H World Group's PE ratio is 19.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.04x versus 3.21x for H World Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of -27.53%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.18 which suggests that it could grow by 41.8%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.716%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.98x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.04x versus 0.98x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 5.77% compared to BYD's net margin of 42.62%. BYD's return on equity of 21.94% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

BYD has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.85 which suggests that it could grow by 14.43%. Given that Trip.com Group has higher upside potential than BYD, analysts believe Trip.com Group is more attractive than BYD.

BYD has a beta of 0.290, which suggesting that the stock is 70.956% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

BYD has a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.28%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BYD pays 13.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. BYD's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BYD quarterly revenues are $28.1B, which are larger than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. BYD's net income of $1.6B is higher than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, BYD's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.98x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 20.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BYD is 1.04x versus 6.43x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.