XPEV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Li Auto has a net margin of -4.2% compared to XPeng's net margin of 2.51%. XPeng's return on equity of -15.58% beat Li Auto's return on equity of 12.05%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 27.56%. On the other hand Li Auto has an analysts' consensus of $33.88 which suggests that it could grow by 14.81%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than Li Auto, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than Li Auto.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Li Auto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Li Auto offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Li Auto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Li Auto quarterly revenues of $3.6B. XPeng's net income of -$91.3M is lower than Li Auto's net income of $89.4M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Li Auto's PE ratio is 27.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.68x versus 1.56x for Li Auto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of -4.2% compared to XPeng's net margin of -36.2%. XPeng's return on equity of -15.58% beat NIO's return on equity of -120.71%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 27.56%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $5.01 which suggests that it could grow by 40.32%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than XPeng.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.621, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.068%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.7B. XPeng's net income of -$91.3M is higher than NIO's net income of -$991.2M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.68x versus 0.79x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -4.2% compared to XPeng's net margin of 2.12%. XPeng's return on equity of -15.58% beat Tesla's return on equity of 9.1%.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 27.56%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $299.38 which suggests that it could fall by -13.04%. Given that XPeng has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe XPeng is more attractive than Tesla.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.468, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 146.818%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $19.3B. XPeng's net income of -$91.3M is lower than Tesla's net income of $409M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tesla's PE ratio is 189.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.68x versus 12.61x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a net margin of -4.2% compared to XPeng's net margin of -3.26%. XPeng's return on equity of -15.58% beat ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's return on equity of --.

XPeng has a consensus price target of $25.04, signalling upside risk potential of 27.56%. On the other hand ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has an analysts' consensus of $39.67 which suggests that it could grow by 48.76%. Given that ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding is more attractive than XPeng.

XPeng has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

XPeng has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. XPeng pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

XPeng quarterly revenues are $2.2B, which are smaller than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding quarterly revenues of $3B. XPeng's net income of -$91.3M is higher than ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's net income of -$98.7M. Notably, XPeng's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for XPeng is 2.68x versus 0.58x for ZEEKR Intelligent Technology Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.