Will This ETF Beat the Market Over the Next 12 Months?
2024 was another banner year for the US stock market,…
Sell
48
VRTS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$219.99
Seasonality move
:
0.75%
Day range:
$215.83 - $220.10
52-week range:
$190.42 - $263.39
Dividend yield:
3.63%
P/E ratio:
13.33x
P/S ratio:
1.80x
P/B ratio:
1.73x
Volume:
30.2K
Avg. volume:
39.5K
1-year change:
-3.93%
Market cap:
$1.5B
Revenue:
$841.5M
EPS (TTM):
$16.45
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
|
$214.1M | $7.62 | 0.09% | 80.93% | $241.25 |
|
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
|
$293.5M | $0.96 | 17.87% | 5.44% | $44.13 |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$955.9M | $1.94 | -91.33% | -58.39% | $182.65 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$86.7M | $0.40 | 130.38% | -21.24% | $14.91 |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$91.8M | $0.54 | 676.25% | 286.77% | $17.70 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
|
$219.21 | $241.25 | $1.5B | 13.33x | $2.25 | 3.63% | 1.80x |
|
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
|
$42.77 | $44.13 | $3B | 11.91x | $0.82 | 6.59% | 2.59x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$169.06 | $182.65 | $95.7B | 17.67x | $0.46 | 1.08% | 3.17x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$155.70 | -- | $423.9M | 8.84x | $1.50 | 3.85% | 2.95x |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$13.63 | $14.91 | $1.3B | 8.74x | $0.38 | 11.15% | 7.33x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$15.32 | $17.70 | $1.3B | 21.28x | $0.55 | 14.36% | 21.39x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
|
71.01% | 1.578 | 139.82% | 3.17x |
|
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
|
34.89% | 1.889 | 5.92% | 0.97x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
35.44% | 1.457 | 11.44% | 0.83x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | 0.665 | -- | 1.97x |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
55.59% | 0.670 | 141.18% | 9.05x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
52.41% | 0.179 | 122.16% | 2.73x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
VRTS
Virtus Investment Partners
|
$120.4M | $51.3M | 3.75% | 12.12% | 48.14% | $68.7M |
|
APAM
Artisan Partners Asset Management
|
$130.5M | $93.2M | 30.98% | 40.89% | 46.85% | $112.2M |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$7.5B | $2.3B | 16.75% | 22.46% | 27.89% | $1.9B |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$16.4M | $10.2M | 29.74% | 29.74% | 23.42% | $18.3M |
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
-- | -- | 4.15% | 9.95% | 196.31% | -$10.1M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
-- | -- | 1.84% | 3.84% | 187.33% | $95.5M |
Virtus Investment Partners vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns VRTS or APAM?
Artisan Partners Asset Management has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Virtus Investment Partners's net margin of 26.11%. Virtus Investment Partners's return on equity of 12.12% beat Artisan Partners Asset Management's return on equity of 40.89%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VRTSVirtus Investment Partners53.29% $5.71 $3.2B APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management46.69% $1.03 $903.4M -
What do Analysts Say About VRTS or APAM?
Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $241.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.99%. On the other hand Artisan Partners Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of $44.13 which suggests that it could grow by 3.17%. Given that Virtus Investment Partners has higher upside potential than Artisan Partners Asset Management, analysts believe Virtus Investment Partners is more attractive than Artisan Partners Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VRTSVirtus Investment Partners0 1 1 APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management0 2 0 -
Is VRTS or APAM More Risky?
Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Artisan Partners Asset Management has a beta of 1.811, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.073%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VRTS or APAM?
Virtus Investment Partners has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Artisan Partners Asset Management offers a yield of 6.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Virtus Investment Partners pays 39.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Artisan Partners Asset Management pays out 82.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VRTS or APAM?
Virtus Investment Partners quarterly revenues are $226M, which are smaller than Artisan Partners Asset Management quarterly revenues of $279.6M. Virtus Investment Partners's net income of $41M is lower than Artisan Partners Asset Management's net income of $73M. Notably, Virtus Investment Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Artisan Partners Asset Management's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virtus Investment Partners is 1.80x versus 2.59x for Artisan Partners Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VRTSVirtus Investment Partners1.80x 13.33x $226M $41M APAMArtisan Partners Asset Management2.59x 11.91x $279.6M $73M
-
Which has Higher Returns VRTS or APO?
Apollo Global Management has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Virtus Investment Partners's net margin of 10.43%. Virtus Investment Partners's return on equity of 12.12% beat Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VRTSVirtus Investment Partners53.29% $5.71 $3.2B APOApollo Global Management96.26% $1.29 $41.3B -
What do Analysts Say About VRTS or APO?
Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $241.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.99%. On the other hand Apollo Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $182.65 which suggests that it could grow by 8.04%. Given that Virtus Investment Partners has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe Virtus Investment Partners is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VRTSVirtus Investment Partners0 1 1 APOApollo Global Management9 5 0 -
Is VRTS or APO More Risky?
Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.631, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VRTS or APO?
Virtus Investment Partners has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Apollo Global Management offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Virtus Investment Partners pays 39.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VRTS or APO?
Virtus Investment Partners quarterly revenues are $226M, which are smaller than Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues of $7.8B. Virtus Investment Partners's net income of $41M is lower than Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M. Notably, Virtus Investment Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Apollo Global Management's PE ratio is 17.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virtus Investment Partners is 1.80x versus 3.17x for Apollo Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VRTSVirtus Investment Partners1.80x 13.33x $226M $41M APOApollo Global Management3.17x 17.67x $7.8B $811M
-
Which has Higher Returns VRTS or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Virtus Investment Partners's net margin of 33.56%. Virtus Investment Partners's return on equity of 12.12% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 29.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VRTSVirtus Investment Partners53.29% $5.71 $3.2B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group37.55% $5.35 $166.5M -
What do Analysts Say About VRTS or DHIL?
Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $241.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.99%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Virtus Investment Partners has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe Virtus Investment Partners is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VRTSVirtus Investment Partners0 1 1 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group0 0 0 -
Is VRTS or DHIL More Risky?
Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.021, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.135%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VRTS or DHIL?
Virtus Investment Partners has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Virtus Investment Partners pays 39.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 41.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VRTS or DHIL?
Virtus Investment Partners quarterly revenues are $226M, which are larger than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $43.6M. Virtus Investment Partners's net income of $41M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, Virtus Investment Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 8.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virtus Investment Partners is 1.80x versus 2.95x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VRTSVirtus Investment Partners1.80x 13.33x $226M $41M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group2.95x 8.84x $43.6M $14.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns VRTS or MFIC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Virtus Investment Partners's net margin of 89.54%. Virtus Investment Partners's return on equity of 12.12% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VRTSVirtus Investment Partners53.29% $5.71 $3.2B MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B -
What do Analysts Say About VRTS or MFIC?
Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $241.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.99%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $14.91 which suggests that it could grow by 9.36%. Given that Virtus Investment Partners has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Virtus Investment Partners is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VRTSVirtus Investment Partners0 1 1 MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 3 0 -
Is VRTS or MFIC More Risky?
Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.490, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.968%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VRTS or MFIC?
Virtus Investment Partners has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Virtus Investment Partners pays 39.85% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtus Investment Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VRTS or MFIC?
Virtus Investment Partners quarterly revenues are $226M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Virtus Investment Partners's net income of $41M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Virtus Investment Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.74x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virtus Investment Partners is 1.80x versus 7.33x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VRTSVirtus Investment Partners1.80x 13.33x $226M $41M MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.33x 8.74x $29.8M $26.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns VRTS or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 18.14% compared to Virtus Investment Partners's net margin of -121.48%. Virtus Investment Partners's return on equity of 12.12% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital VRTSVirtus Investment Partners53.29% $5.71 $3.2B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending-- $0.45 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About VRTS or OCSL?
Virtus Investment Partners has a consensus price target of $241.25, signalling upside risk potential of 11.99%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $17.70 which suggests that it could grow by 10.42%. Given that Virtus Investment Partners has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Virtus Investment Partners is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings VRTSVirtus Investment Partners0 1 1 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending1 6 0 -
Is VRTS or OCSL More Risky?
Virtus Investment Partners has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.926% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.634%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock VRTS or OCSL?
Virtus Investment Partners has a quarterly dividend of $2.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.63%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Virtus Investment Partners pays 39.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Virtus Investment Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios VRTS or OCSL?
Virtus Investment Partners quarterly revenues are $226M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Virtus Investment Partners's net income of $41M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Virtus Investment Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.33x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Virtus Investment Partners is 1.80x versus 21.39x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income VRTSVirtus Investment Partners1.80x 13.33x $226M $41M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending21.39x 21.28x $36.5M $36.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Did Carlos Slim Buy PBF Energy?
Carlos Slim made a splash in a surprising sector last…
Is Booking Holdings Stock Undervalued?
There is a lot of humdrum in the market about…
Stock Ideas
Sell
48
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 121x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
39
DOGZ alert for Jan 4
Dogness (International) [DOGZ] is down 20.52% over the past day.
Buy
66
DMRC alert for Jan 4
Digimarc [DMRC] is up 16.19% over the past day.
Sell
39
MSTR alert for Jan 4
MicroStrategy [MSTR] is up 13.33% over the past day.
