MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -7.58%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.718%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.57%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.77x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 8.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.85x versus 8.96x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 91.13%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 0.26%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.552, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 44.846%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.57%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.77x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.85x versus 12.59x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goldman Sachs BDC has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 89.74%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Goldman Sachs BDC's return on equity of 3.28%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Goldman Sachs BDC has an analysts' consensus of $11.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.18%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Goldman Sachs BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Goldman Sachs BDC.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goldman Sachs BDC has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.834%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.57%. Goldman Sachs BDC offers a yield of 14.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Goldman Sachs BDC pays out 314.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are smaller than Goldman Sachs BDC quarterly revenues of $35.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is lower than Goldman Sachs BDC's net income of $31.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.77x while Goldman Sachs BDC's PE ratio is 25.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.85x versus 19.42x for Goldman Sachs BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 95.41% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 90.2%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of $13.88, signalling upside risk potential of 5.83%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -3.67%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.004, which suggesting that the stock is 0.40500000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.744, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.64%.

MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.57%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $31.8M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.77x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 112.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 9.85x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.