GBDC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 98.44% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 99.99%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.56%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.493%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.82%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $94.2M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.26x versus 13.21x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gladstone Capital has a net margin of 98.44% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 96.47%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68% beat Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.56%. On the other hand Gladstone Capital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -13.32%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.919%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.82%. Gladstone Capital offers a yield of 7.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital pays out 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $94.2M, which are larger than Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues of $33.1M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M is higher than Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Gladstone Capital's PE ratio is 4.44x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.26x versus 4.66x for Gladstone Capital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 98.44% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of 89.54%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.56%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.01%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.614%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.82%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $94.2M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.26x versus 7.29x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 98.44% compared to Golub Capital BDC's net margin of -121.48%. Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

Golub Capital BDC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 6.56%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.22%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.

Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, which suggesting that the stock is 36.861% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Golub Capital BDC has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.82%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Golub Capital BDC pays 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues are $94.2M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Golub Capital BDC's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.82x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Golub Capital BDC is 11.26x versus 21.23x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.