GLAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 99.99%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.32%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2.62%. Given that Gladstone Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Gladstone Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.493%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.44x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 4.66x versus 13.21x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 98.44%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.32%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 6.56%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.861%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Golub Capital BDC's is not.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $94.2M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.44x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 4.66x versus 11.26x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of 89.54%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.32%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.01%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.614%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are larger than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $29.8M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M is higher than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.44x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 8.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 4.66x versus 7.29x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 96.47% compared to Gladstone Capital's net margin of -121.48%. Gladstone Capital's return on equity of 21.7% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.

Gladstone Capital has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.32%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 10.86%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than Gladstone Capital, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than Gladstone Capital.

Gladstone Capital has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.919% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.

Gladstone Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.04%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Gladstone Capital pays 45.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Capital's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Oaktree Specialty Lending's is not.

Gladstone Capital quarterly revenues are $33.1M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. Gladstone Capital's net income of $31.9M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, Gladstone Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 4.44x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Gladstone Capital is 4.66x versus 21.30x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.