APO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BlackRock has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 31.38%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat BlackRock's return on equity of 14.5%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 7.37%. On the other hand BlackRock has an analysts' consensus of $1,145.59 which suggests that it could grow by 9.71%. Given that BlackRock has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe BlackRock is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BlackRock has a beta of 1.287, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.664%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. BlackRock offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $5.10 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. BlackRock pays out 55.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than BlackRock quarterly revenues of $5.2B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is lower than BlackRock's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while BlackRock's PE ratio is 25.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.20x versus 8.08x for BlackRock. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blackstone has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 27.05%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 11.9%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 7.37%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $178.70 which suggests that it could grow by 2.7%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than Blackstone, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than Blackstone.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.510, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.041%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Blackstone offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.86 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 306.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is higher than Blackstone's net income of $780.8M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 59.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.20x versus 14.24x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 23.55%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 10.26%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 7.37%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $605.50 which suggests that it could grow by 5.09%. Given that Apollo Global Management has higher upside potential than The Goldman Sachs Group, analysts believe Apollo Global Management is more attractive than The Goldman Sachs Group.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.378, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.781%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 49.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $3B. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 16.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.20x versus 3.81x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KKR & has a net margin of 10.43% compared to Apollo Global Management's net margin of 12.69%. Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46% beat KKR &'s return on equity of 5.03%.

Apollo Global Management has a consensus price target of $182.82, signalling upside risk potential of 7.37%. On the other hand KKR & has an analysts' consensus of $167.70 which suggests that it could grow by 11.91%. Given that KKR & has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe KKR & is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.

Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, which suggesting that the stock is 62.765% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KKR & has a beta of 1.633, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.328%.

Apollo Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. KKR & offers a yield of 0.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Apollo Global Management pays 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. KKR & pays out 16.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues are $7.8B, which are larger than KKR & quarterly revenues of $4.7B. Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M is higher than KKR &'s net income of $600.6M. Notably, Apollo Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.79x while KKR &'s PE ratio is 46.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Apollo Global Management is 3.20x versus 6.09x for KKR &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.