VIPS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of 5.06% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of -13.73%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 21.46% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.97, signalling upside risk potential of 17.2%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.99%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Vipshop Holdings, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Vipshop Holdings.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.749%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.53x while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 57.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.49x versus 0.60x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NIO has a net margin of 5.06% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of -27.53%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 21.46% beat NIO's return on equity of -98.45%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.97, signalling upside risk potential of 17.2%. On the other hand NIO has an analysts' consensus of $6.32 which suggests that it could grow by 36.7%. Given that NIO has higher upside potential than Vipshop Holdings, analysts believe NIO is more attractive than Vipshop Holdings.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NIO has a beta of 1.769, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.919%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. NIO offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NIO pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than NIO quarterly revenues of $2.6B. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than NIO's net income of -$718.1M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.53x while NIO's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.49x versus 1.04x for NIO. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of 5.06% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of 42.62%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 21.46% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.97, signalling upside risk potential of 17.2%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $146M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.53x while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.49x versus 6.92x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

XPeng has a net margin of 5.06% compared to Vipshop Holdings's net margin of -17.9%. Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 21.46% beat XPeng's return on equity of -17.41%.

Vipshop Holdings has a consensus price target of $15.97, signalling upside risk potential of 17.2%. On the other hand XPeng has an analysts' consensus of $14.36 which suggests that it could grow by 10.6%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than XPeng, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than XPeng.

Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.309, which suggesting that the stock is 69.128% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison XPeng has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vipshop Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.16%. XPeng offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vipshop Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. XPeng pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.9B, which are larger than XPeng quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Vipshop Holdings's net income of $146M is higher than XPeng's net income of -$252.5M. Notably, Vipshop Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.53x while XPeng's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vipshop Holdings is 0.49x versus 2.30x for XPeng. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.