BZUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kandi Technologies Group has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of -13.73%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Kandi Technologies Group's return on equity of -1.54%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.57%. On the other hand Kandi Technologies Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.99%. Given that Kandi Technologies Group has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe Kandi Technologies Group is more attractive than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kandi Technologies Group has a beta of 1.377, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.749%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kandi Technologies Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Kandi Technologies Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are larger than Kandi Technologies Group quarterly revenues of $29.9M. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Kandi Technologies Group's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kandi Technologies Group's PE ratio is 57.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.15x versus 0.60x for Kandi Technologies Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of 42.62%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.57%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.01 which suggests that it could grow by 5.11%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Baozun has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.385, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.53%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 21.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.15x versus 6.92x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of 23.9%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Tuniu's return on equity of -2.93%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.57%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 146.51%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.678, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.838%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $26M. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Tuniu's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.15x versus 1.67x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vipshop Holdings has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of 5.06%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Vipshop Holdings's return on equity of 21.46%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 7.57%. On the other hand Vipshop Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $15.97 which suggests that it could grow by 17.2%. Given that Vipshop Holdings has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe Vipshop Holdings is more attractive than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.323, which suggesting that the stock is 67.666% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vipshop Holdings has a beta of 0.309, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.128%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vipshop Holdings offers a yield of 3.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Vipshop Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are smaller than Vipshop Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.9B. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Vipshop Holdings's net income of $146M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vipshop Holdings's PE ratio is 6.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.15x versus 0.49x for Vipshop Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.