SRI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Standard Motor Products has a net margin of -3.31% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of 0.95%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -2.68% beat Standard Motor Products's return on equity of 5.54%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 125.44%. On the other hand Standard Motor Products has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 30.6%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Standard Motor Products, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Standard Motor Products.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Standard Motor Products has a beta of 0.522, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.771%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Standard Motor Products offers a yield of 3.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products pays out 73.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Standard Motor Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $213.8M, which are smaller than Standard Motor Products quarterly revenues of $399.3M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Standard Motor Products's net income of $3.8M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.57x while Standard Motor Products's PE ratio is 19.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.19x versus 0.49x for Standard Motor Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gentherm has a net margin of -3.31% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of 4.3%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -2.68% beat Gentherm's return on equity of 10.41%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 125.44%. On the other hand Gentherm has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 56.37%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Gentherm, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Gentherm.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gentherm has a beta of 1.423, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.321%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gentherm offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gentherm pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $213.8M, which are smaller than Gentherm quarterly revenues of $371.5M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Gentherm's net income of $16M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.57x while Gentherm's PE ratio is 18.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.19x versus 0.84x for Gentherm. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tesla has a net margin of -3.31% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of 8.61%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -2.68% beat Tesla's return on equity of 19.77%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 125.44%. On the other hand Tesla has an analysts' consensus of $283.88 which suggests that it could fall by -34.24%. Given that Stoneridge has higher upside potential than Tesla, analysts believe Stoneridge is more attractive than Tesla.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tesla has a beta of 2.361, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 136.098%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tesla offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tesla pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $213.8M, which are smaller than Tesla quarterly revenues of $25.2B. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Tesla's net income of $2.2B. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.57x while Tesla's PE ratio is 118.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.19x versus 15.51x for Tesla. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Twin Vee PowerCats has a net margin of -3.31% compared to Stoneridge's net margin of -86.59%. Stoneridge's return on equity of -2.68% beat Twin Vee PowerCats's return on equity of -34.03%.

Stoneridge has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 125.44%. On the other hand Twin Vee PowerCats has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2128.41%. Given that Twin Vee PowerCats has higher upside potential than Stoneridge, analysts believe Twin Vee PowerCats is more attractive than Stoneridge.

Stoneridge has a beta of 1.344, which suggesting that the stock is 34.441% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Twin Vee PowerCats has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stoneridge has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Twin Vee PowerCats offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stoneridge pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Twin Vee PowerCats pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stoneridge quarterly revenues are $213.8M, which are larger than Twin Vee PowerCats quarterly revenues of $2.9M. Stoneridge's net income of -$7.1M is lower than Twin Vee PowerCats's net income of -$2.5M. Notably, Stoneridge's price-to-earnings ratio is 194.57x while Twin Vee PowerCats's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stoneridge is 0.19x versus 0.16x for Twin Vee PowerCats. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.