Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Buy
65
SQM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$40.17
Seasonality move
:
7.06%
Day range:
$39.88 - $40.70
52-week range:
$32.24 - $51.90
Dividend yield:
5.23%
P/E ratio:
415.86x
P/S ratio:
2.41x
P/B ratio:
2.26x
Volume:
1M
Avg. volume:
1M
1-year change:
-17.4%
Market cap:
$11.5B
Revenue:
$7.5B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQM
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA
|
$1.1B | $0.84 | -24.54% | -28.64% | $54.22 |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
$1.3B | -$0.44 | -5.97% | -444.35% | $117.05 |
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$277.6M | $0.04 | 6.29% | 300.1% | $6.09 |
|
ATLX
Atlas Lithium
|
$15.4M | -$0.30 | -100% | -65.84% | -- |
|
PILBF
Pilbara Minerals
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
|
$37.2M | -$0.68 | -32.68% | -80.05% | $14.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQM
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA
|
$40.16 | $54.22 | $11.5B | 415.86x | $0.22 | 5.23% | 2.41x |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
$97.49 | $117.05 | $11.5B | 43.27x | $0.41 | 1.65% | 1.76x |
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$5.72 | $6.09 | $6.2B | 34.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.21x |
|
ATLX
Atlas Lithium
|
$6.90 | -- | $105.2M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
PILBF
Pilbara Minerals
|
$1.47 | -- | $4.4B | 24.49x | $0.09 | 0% | 3.79x |
|
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
|
$9.08 | $14.50 | $198M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.73x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQM
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA
|
48.43% | 1.446 | 40.01% | 1.98x |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
25.84% | 2.200 | 26.66% | 1.40x |
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
10.32% | 0.000 | 18.56% | 0.57x |
|
ATLX
Atlas Lithium
|
30.1% | -2.629 | 9.62% | 3.44x |
|
PILBF
Pilbara Minerals
|
12.11% | 0.462 | 4.86% | 3.96x |
|
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
|
7.75% | -0.114 | 13.86% | 1.93x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SQM
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA
|
$280.8M | $210.7M | -3.4% | -6.27% | 22.18% | -- |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
-$104M | -$280.7M | -13% | -17.47% | -83.49% | -$62.6M |
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$56.2M | $15.3M | 2.8% | 3.08% | 7.53% | -$278.2M |
|
ATLX
Atlas Lithium
|
$69.5K | -$10.3M | -222.12% | -352.48% | -6054.53% | -$9.7M |
|
PILBF
Pilbara Minerals
|
-- | -- | 6.7% | 7.62% | -- | -- |
|
PLL
Piedmont Lithium
|
$2.7M | -$6.8M | -24.62% | -25.05% | -59.71% | -$9.7M |
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SQM or ALB?
Albemarle has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net margin of -78.91%. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's return on equity of -6.27% beat Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA26.08% $0.46 $9.9B ALBAlbemarle-7.68% -$9.45 $14.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SQM or ALB?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Albemarle has an analysts' consensus of $117.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.07%. Given that Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is more attractive than Albemarle.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA7 5 0 ALBAlbemarle8 15 1 -
Is SQM or ALB More Risky?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQM or ALB?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Albemarle offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle pays out 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQM or ALB?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Albemarle quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net income of $131.4M is higher than Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 415.86x while Albemarle's PE ratio is 43.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is 2.41x versus 1.76x for Albemarle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA2.41x 415.86x $1.1B $131.4M ALBAlbemarle1.76x 43.27x $1.4B -$1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns SQM or ALTM?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net margin of 7.93%. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's return on equity of -6.27% beat Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA26.08% $0.46 $9.9B ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SQM or ALTM?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Arcadium Lithium PLC has an analysts' consensus of $6.09 which suggests that it could grow by 6.42%. Given that Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA7 5 0 ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 -
Is SQM or ALTM More Risky?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQM or ALTM?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Arcadium Lithium PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQM or ALTM?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues of $203.1M. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net income of $131.4M is higher than Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M. Notably, Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 415.86x while Arcadium Lithium PLC's PE ratio is 34.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is 2.41x versus 6.21x for Arcadium Lithium PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA2.41x 415.86x $1.1B $131.4M ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SQM or ATLX?
Atlas Lithium has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net margin of -5325.18%. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's return on equity of -6.27% beat Atlas Lithium's return on equity of -352.48%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA26.08% $0.46 $9.9B ATLXAtlas Lithium40.97% -$0.60 $33.8M -
What do Analysts Say About SQM or ATLX?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Atlas Lithium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 300.97%. Given that Atlas Lithium has higher upside potential than Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA, analysts believe Atlas Lithium is more attractive than Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA7 5 0 ATLXAtlas Lithium0 0 0 -
Is SQM or ATLX More Risky?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlas Lithium has a beta of -3.596, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 459.572%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQM or ATLX?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Atlas Lithium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Atlas Lithium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQM or ATLX?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Atlas Lithium quarterly revenues of $169.6K. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net income of $131.4M is higher than Atlas Lithium's net income of -$9M. Notably, Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 415.86x while Atlas Lithium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is 2.41x versus -- for Atlas Lithium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA2.41x 415.86x $1.1B $131.4M ATLXAtlas Lithium-- -- $169.6K -$9M
-
Which has Higher Returns SQM or PILBF?
Pilbara Minerals has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net margin of --. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's return on equity of -6.27% beat Pilbara Minerals's return on equity of 7.62%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA26.08% $0.46 $9.9B PILBFPilbara Minerals-- -- $2.5B -
What do Analysts Say About SQM or PILBF?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Pilbara Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has higher upside potential than Pilbara Minerals, analysts believe Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is more attractive than Pilbara Minerals.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA7 5 0 PILBFPilbara Minerals0 0 0 -
Is SQM or PILBF More Risky?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pilbara Minerals has a beta of 2.290, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 129.035%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQM or PILBF?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Pilbara Minerals offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Pilbara Minerals pays out 163.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pilbara Minerals's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQM or PILBF?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Pilbara Minerals quarterly revenues of --. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net income of $131.4M is higher than Pilbara Minerals's net income of --. Notably, Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 415.86x while Pilbara Minerals's PE ratio is 24.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is 2.41x versus 3.79x for Pilbara Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA2.41x 415.86x $1.1B $131.4M PILBFPilbara Minerals3.79x 24.49x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SQM or PLL?
Piedmont Lithium has a net margin of 12.21% compared to Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net margin of -60.32%. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's return on equity of -6.27% beat Piedmont Lithium's return on equity of -25.05%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA26.08% $0.46 $9.9B PLLPiedmont Lithium9.59% -$0.86 $310.3M -
What do Analysts Say About SQM or PLL?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a consensus price target of $54.22, signalling upside risk potential of 35.02%. On the other hand Piedmont Lithium has an analysts' consensus of $14.50 which suggests that it could grow by 59.78%. Given that Piedmont Lithium has higher upside potential than Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA, analysts believe Piedmont Lithium is more attractive than Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA7 5 0 PLLPiedmont Lithium2 3 0 -
Is SQM or PLL More Risky?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a beta of 1.037, which suggesting that the stock is 3.669% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Piedmont Lithium has a beta of 0.797, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.35%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SQM or PLL?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.23%. Piedmont Lithium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA pays 73.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Piedmont Lithium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SQM or PLL?
Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Piedmont Lithium quarterly revenues of $27.7M. Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's net income of $131.4M is higher than Piedmont Lithium's net income of -$16.7M. Notably, Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA's price-to-earnings ratio is 415.86x while Piedmont Lithium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA is 2.41x versus 3.73x for Piedmont Lithium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SQMSociedad Quimica Y Minera De Chile SA2.41x 415.86x $1.1B $131.4M PLLPiedmont Lithium3.73x -- $27.7M -$16.7M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
