ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -10.34%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $101.87, signalling upside risk potential of 40.7%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.33%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.821% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 0.93%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $101.87, signalling upside risk potential of 40.7%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.18%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.821% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.517%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.37x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 6%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 1.46%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $101.87, signalling upside risk potential of 40.7%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $31.99 which suggests that it could grow by 27.64%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.821% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.465%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 154.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $169M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 45.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.72x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of 6.11% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 4.06%. Albemarle's return on equity of -11% beat Nucor's return on equity of 9.33%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $101.87, signalling upside risk potential of 40.7%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $155.62 which suggests that it could grow by 20.12%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Nucor, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Nucor.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.698, which suggesting that the stock is 69.821% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.578, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.84%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 25.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.1B. Albemarle's net income of $75.3M is lower than Nucor's net income of $287M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Nucor's PE ratio is 15.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 1.01x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.