ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -5.3%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $13.45 which suggests that it could grow by 37.96%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntsman has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -2.14%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Huntsman's return on equity of -3.46%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Huntsman has an analysts' consensus of $22.38 which suggests that it could grow by 35.58%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntsman has a beta of 0.974, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.613%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Huntsman offers a yield of 6.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntsman pays out 167.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Huntsman's is not.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Huntsman quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Huntsman's net income of -$33M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Huntsman's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.48x for Huntsman. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 4.35%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.06%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.77 which suggests that it could grow by 32.78%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.838%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 21.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.70x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nucor has a net margin of -78.91% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 3.36%. Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47% beat Nucor's return on equity of 11.62%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $117.72, signalling upside risk potential of 34.72%. On the other hand Nucor has an analysts' consensus of $159.55 which suggests that it could grow by 35%. Given that Nucor has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Nucor is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.573% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nucor has a beta of 1.604, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.425%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.84%. Nucor offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Albemarle pays 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Nucor pays out 11.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are smaller than Nucor quarterly revenues of $7.4B. Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B is lower than Nucor's net income of $249.9M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Nucor's PE ratio is 11.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.58x versus 0.91x for Nucor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.