ALB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Albemarle's net margin of --. Albemarle's return on equity of -10.51% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $82.42, signalling upside risk potential of 47.8%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 152.66%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.978%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Albemarle's net income of $41.3M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.29x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Albemarle's net margin of 4.97%. Albemarle's return on equity of -10.51% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 13%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $82.42, signalling upside risk potential of 47.8%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $146.84 which suggests that it could grow by 19.31%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.379, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.919%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Albemarle's net income of $41.3M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $217.2M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.29x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Albemarle's net margin of -3.11%. Albemarle's return on equity of -10.51% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 0.85%.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $82.42, signalling upside risk potential of 47.8%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $45.59 which suggests that it could fall by -20.25%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than United States Steel.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.869, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.943%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.7B. Albemarle's net income of $41.3M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$116M. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 185.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.29x versus 0.87x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 3.84% compared to Albemarle's net margin of --. Albemarle's return on equity of -10.51% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

Albemarle has a consensus price target of $82.42, signalling upside risk potential of 47.8%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.38%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Albemarle, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Albemarle.

Albemarle has a beta of 1.609, which suggesting that the stock is 60.857% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.470, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.985%.

Albemarle has a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.9%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Albemarle pays -26.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Albemarle quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Albemarle's net income of $41.3M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$511K. Notably, Albemarle's price-to-earnings ratio is 43.27x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Albemarle is 1.29x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.