Why Is AT&T Stock Dropping?
The telecommunications giant AT&T Inc. (NYSE:T) has perhaps surprisingly eclipsed…
Buy
57
ALTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$5.72
Seasonality move
:
-31.79%
Day range:
$5.70 - $5.73
52-week range:
$2.19 - $5.73
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
34.31x
P/S ratio:
6.21x
P/B ratio:
0.98x
Volume:
8.7M
Avg. volume:
16M
1-year change:
7.32%
Market cap:
$6.2B
Revenue:
$882.5M
EPS (TTM):
$0.17
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$277.6M | $0.04 | 6.29% | 300.1% | $6.09 |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
$1.3B | -$0.44 | -5.97% | -444.35% | $117.05 |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | -$0.03 | -- | -- | -- |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $80.00 |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -$0.01 | -- | -- | $1.50 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$5.72 | $6.09 | $6.2B | 34.31x | $0.00 | 0% | 6.21x |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
$97.49 | $117.05 | $11.5B | 43.27x | $0.41 | 1.65% | 1.76x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$13.95 | -- | $97.2M | 12.24x | $0.04 | 1.15% | 0.21x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
$0.40 | -- | $26.3M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
$61.10 | $80.00 | $99.2B | 8.99x | $1.77 | 7.12% | 1.84x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
$0.65 | $1.50 | $53M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
10.32% | 0.000 | 18.56% | 0.57x |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
25.84% | 2.200 | 26.66% | 1.40x |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
21.78% | 0.211 | 32.37% | 1.16x |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-- | 0.990 | -- | -- |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
18.91% | -0.123 | 11.82% | 1.16x |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-- | -1.136 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ALTM
Arcadium Lithium PLC
|
$56.2M | $15.3M | 2.8% | 3.08% | 7.53% | -$278.2M |
|
ALB
Albemarle
|
-$104M | -$280.7M | -13% | -17.47% | -83.49% | -$62.6M |
|
FRD
Friedman Industries
|
$10.1M | -$2K | 4.68% | 6.32% | -0.03% | $8.9M |
|
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
|
-$166.6K | -$1.4M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.2M |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | 15.69% | 19.33% | -- | -- |
|
XPL
Solitario Resources
|
-$8K | -$2.5M | -- | -- | -- | -$1.8M |
Arcadium Lithium PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ALTM or ALB?
Albemarle has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of -78.91%. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Albemarle's return on equity of -17.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B ALBAlbemarle-7.68% -$9.45 $14.1B -
What do Analysts Say About ALTM or ALB?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.09, signalling upside risk potential of 6.42%. On the other hand Albemarle has an analysts' consensus of $117.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.07%. Given that Albemarle has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Albemarle is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 ALBAlbemarle8 15 1 -
Is ALTM or ALB More Risky?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Albemarle has a beta of 1.586, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.573%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALTM or ALB?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Albemarle offers a yield of 1.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle pays out 11.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Albemarle's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALTM or ALB?
Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are smaller than Albemarle quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Albemarle's net income of -$1.1B. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Albemarle's PE ratio is 43.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 6.21x versus 1.76x for Albemarle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M ALBAlbemarle1.76x 43.27x $1.4B -$1.1B
-
Which has Higher Returns ALTM or FRD?
Friedman Industries has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of -0.63%. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 6.32%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B FRDFriedman Industries9.5% -$0.10 $164.6M -
What do Analysts Say About ALTM or FRD?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.09, signalling upside risk potential of 6.42%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Arcadium Lithium PLC has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Arcadium Lithium PLC is more attractive than Friedman Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 FRDFriedman Industries0 0 0 -
Is ALTM or FRD More Risky?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.411, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.118%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALTM or FRD?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 1.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALTM or FRD?
Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are larger than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $106.8M. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$675K. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 12.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 6.21x versus 0.21x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M FRDFriedman Industries0.21x 12.24x $106.8M -$675K
-
Which has Higher Returns ALTM or PZG?
Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -$0.02 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ALTM or PZG?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.09, signalling upside risk potential of 6.42%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 201.74%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 PZGParamount Gold Nevada0 0 0 -
Is ALTM or PZG More Risky?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALTM or PZG?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALTM or PZG?
Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 6.21x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M PZGParamount Gold Nevada-- -- -- -$1.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns ALTM or RIO?
Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 19.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B RIORio Tinto PLC-- -- $70B -
What do Analysts Say About ALTM or RIO?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.09, signalling upside risk potential of 6.42%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $80.00 which suggests that it could grow by 30.93%. Given that Rio Tinto PLC has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Rio Tinto PLC is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 RIORio Tinto PLC5 0 0 -
Is ALTM or RIO More Risky?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.656, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.355%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALTM or RIO?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 64.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALTM or RIO?
Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 6.21x versus 1.84x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M RIORio Tinto PLC1.84x 8.99x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ALTM or XPL?
Solitario Resources has a net margin of 7.93% compared to Arcadium Lithium PLC's net margin of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's return on equity of 3.08% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC27.67% $0.01 $7.9B XPLSolitario Resources-- -$0.03 -- -
What do Analysts Say About ALTM or XPL?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a consensus price target of $6.09, signalling upside risk potential of 6.42%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 130.7%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Arcadium Lithium PLC, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Arcadium Lithium PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC4 17 0 XPLSolitario Resources0 0 0 -
Is ALTM or XPL More Risky?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ALTM or XPL?
Arcadium Lithium PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Arcadium Lithium PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ALTM or XPL?
Arcadium Lithium PLC quarterly revenues are $203.1M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Arcadium Lithium PLC's net income of $16.1M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Arcadium Lithium PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 34.31x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Arcadium Lithium PLC is 6.21x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ALTMArcadium Lithium PLC6.21x 34.31x $203.1M $16.1M XPLSolitario Resources-- -- -- -$2.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is American Express Stock Going Lower?
American Express Company (NYSE:AXP) has long been a Buffett favorite…
Cigna vs Costco Stock: Which Is Best?
Cigna and Costco don’t usually go hand in hand but…
Stock Ideas
Sell
46
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 115x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
45
QMCO alert for Jan 18
Quantum [QMCO] is down 15.61% over the past day.
Buy
51
QRVO alert for Jan 18
Qorvo [QRVO] is up 14.47% over the past day.
Sell
31
ATEX alert for Jan 18
Anterix [ATEX] is up 11.14% over the past day.
