SPXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fastenal has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 14.37%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Fastenal's return on equity of 32.9%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $171.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Fastenal has an analysts' consensus of $75.35 which suggests that it could fall by -2.91%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Fastenal, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Fastenal.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fastenal has a beta of 1.046, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.641%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fastenal offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal pays out 77.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Fastenal's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Fastenal quarterly revenues of $1.8B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Fastenal's net income of $262.1M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.18x while Fastenal's PE ratio is 38.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.15x versus 5.91x for Fastenal. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 4.02%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $171.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $193.05 which suggests that it could grow by 20.1%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.162, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.228%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 2.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.18x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.15x versus 1.08x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Comfort Systems USA has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 7.81%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 35.18%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $171.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand Comfort Systems USA has an analysts' consensus of $493.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.39%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than SPX Technologies, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than SPX Technologies.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.602%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Comfort Systems USA offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA pays out 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues of $1.9B. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is lower than Comfort Systems USA's net income of $145.9M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.18x while Comfort Systems USA's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.15x versus 1.68x for Comfort Systems USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

IES Holdings has a net margin of 10.7% compared to SPX Technologies's net margin of 7.51%. SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.52% beat IES Holdings's return on equity of 37.95%.

SPX Technologies has a consensus price target of $171.50, signalling upside risk potential of 29.43%. On the other hand IES Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than IES Holdings, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than IES Holdings.

SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.220, which suggesting that the stock is 21.973% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IES Holdings has a beta of 1.507, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.702%.

SPX Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IES Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SPX Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IES Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SPX Technologies quarterly revenues are $533.7M, which are smaller than IES Holdings quarterly revenues of $749.5M. SPX Technologies's net income of $57.1M is higher than IES Holdings's net income of $56.3M. Notably, SPX Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is 31.18x while IES Holdings's PE ratio is 15.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPX Technologies is 3.15x versus 1.15x for IES Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.