FIX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The AZEK has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 12%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat The AZEK's return on equity of 10.81%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand The AZEK has an analysts' consensus of $53.91 which suggests that it could grow by 8.88%. Given that The AZEK has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe The AZEK is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The AZEK has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. The AZEK offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. The AZEK pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than The AZEK quarterly revenues of $452.2M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is higher than The AZEK's net income of $54.3M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while The AZEK's PE ratio is 48.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.33x versus 4.76x for The AZEK. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ferguson Enterprises has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 4.02%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat Ferguson Enterprises's return on equity of 29.6%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand Ferguson Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $194.21 which suggests that it could grow by 6.51%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Ferguson Enterprises, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Ferguson Enterprises.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ferguson Enterprises has a beta of 1.097, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.666%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Ferguson Enterprises offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Ferguson Enterprises pays out 45.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Ferguson Enterprises quarterly revenues of $6.9B. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is lower than Ferguson Enterprises's net income of $276M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Ferguson Enterprises's PE ratio is 22.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.33x versus 1.23x for Ferguson Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Construction Partners has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 0.74%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.38%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand Construction Partners has an analysts' consensus of $108.30 which suggests that it could grow by 4.96%. Given that Comfort Systems USA has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Comfort Systems USA is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Construction Partners has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.138%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. Construction Partners offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Construction Partners pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Construction Partners quarterly revenues of $571.7M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is higher than Construction Partners's net income of $4.2M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while Construction Partners's PE ratio is 88.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.33x versus 2.53x for Construction Partners. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SPX Technologies has a net margin of 9.24% compared to Comfort Systems USA's net margin of 10.61%. Comfort Systems USA's return on equity of 37.57% beat SPX Technologies's return on equity of 15.11%.

Comfort Systems USA has a consensus price target of $514.17, signalling upside risk potential of 7.52%. On the other hand SPX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $171.36 which suggests that it could grow by 12.18%. Given that SPX Technologies has higher upside potential than Comfort Systems USA, analysts believe SPX Technologies is more attractive than Comfort Systems USA.

Comfort Systems USA has a beta of 1.479, which suggesting that the stock is 47.884% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPX Technologies has a beta of 1.210, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.045%.

Comfort Systems USA has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.31%. SPX Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Comfort Systems USA pays 8.19% of its earnings as a dividend. SPX Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Comfort Systems USA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Comfort Systems USA quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than SPX Technologies quarterly revenues of $482.6M. Comfort Systems USA's net income of $169.3M is higher than SPX Technologies's net income of $51.2M. Notably, Comfort Systems USA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.69x while SPX Technologies's PE ratio is 35.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Comfort Systems USA is 2.33x versus 3.60x for SPX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.