SEMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of 3.26% compared to SEMrush Holdings's net margin of 20.17%. SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

SEMrush Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.57, signalling upside risk potential of 73.46%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 4%. Given that SEMrush Holdings has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe SEMrush Holdings is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

SEMrush Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. SEMrush Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.6M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, SEMrush Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 202.60x while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEMrush Holdings is 4.00x versus 6.49x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AudioEye has a net margin of 3.26% compared to SEMrush Holdings's net margin of -15.3%. SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat AudioEye's return on equity of -63.94%.

SEMrush Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.57, signalling upside risk potential of 73.46%. On the other hand AudioEye has an analysts' consensus of $26.40 which suggests that it could grow by 129.77%. Given that AudioEye has higher upside potential than SEMrush Holdings, analysts believe AudioEye is more attractive than SEMrush Holdings.

SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AudioEye has a beta of 1.107, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.748%.

SEMrush Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. AudioEye offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SEMrush Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. AudioEye pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.6M, which are larger than AudioEye quarterly revenues of $9.7M. SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than AudioEye's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, SEMrush Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 202.60x while AudioEye's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEMrush Holdings is 4.00x versus 3.88x for AudioEye. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of 3.26% compared to SEMrush Holdings's net margin of 0.54%. SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

SEMrush Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.57, signalling upside risk potential of 73.46%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 224.9%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than SEMrush Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than SEMrush Holdings.

SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

SEMrush Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SEMrush Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.6M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, SEMrush Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 202.60x while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEMrush Holdings is 4.00x versus 0.72x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Riskified has a net margin of 3.26% compared to SEMrush Holdings's net margin of -4.37%. SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35% beat Riskified's return on equity of -8.05%.

SEMrush Holdings has a consensus price target of $17.57, signalling upside risk potential of 73.46%. On the other hand Riskified has an analysts' consensus of $5.91 which suggests that it could grow by 25.93%. Given that SEMrush Holdings has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe SEMrush Holdings is more attractive than Riskified.

SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Riskified has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

SEMrush Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Riskified offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SEMrush Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Riskified pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues are $102.6M, which are larger than Riskified quarterly revenues of $93.5M. SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M is higher than Riskified's net income of -$4.1M. Notably, SEMrush Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 202.60x while Riskified's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SEMrush Holdings is 4.00x versus 2.45x for Riskified. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.