RSKD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Automatic Data Processing has a net margin of -4.37% compared to Riskified's net margin of 20.17%. Riskified's return on equity of -8.05% beat Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 82.22%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.91, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Automatic Data Processing has an analysts' consensus of $309.41 which suggests that it could grow by 4.77%. Given that Riskified has higher upside potential than Automatic Data Processing, analysts believe Riskified is more attractive than Automatic Data Processing.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.473%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Automatic Data Processing offers a yield of 1.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.54 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing pays out 58.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Automatic Data Processing's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are smaller than Automatic Data Processing quarterly revenues of $4.8B. Riskified's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Automatic Data Processing's net income of $963.2M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Automatic Data Processing's PE ratio is 30.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.43x versus 6.45x for Automatic Data Processing. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Autodesk has a net margin of -4.37% compared to Riskified's net margin of 18.49%. Riskified's return on equity of -8.05% beat Autodesk's return on equity of 47.41%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.91, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Autodesk has an analysts' consensus of $335.29 which suggests that it could grow by 25.46%. Given that Riskified has higher upside potential than Autodesk, analysts believe Riskified is more attractive than Autodesk.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Autodesk has a beta of 1.506, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.556%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Autodesk offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Autodesk pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are smaller than Autodesk quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Riskified's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Autodesk's net income of $303M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Autodesk's PE ratio is 52.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.43x versus 9.46x for Autodesk. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Inuvo has a net margin of -4.37% compared to Riskified's net margin of 0.54%. Riskified's return on equity of -8.05% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -40.29%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.91, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of $1.40 which suggests that it could grow by 220.95%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Riskified.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 0.859, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.144%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $26.2M. Riskified's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Inuvo's net income of $141.3K. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.43x versus 0.73x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SEMrush Holdings has a net margin of -4.37% compared to Riskified's net margin of 3.26%. Riskified's return on equity of -8.05% beat SEMrush Holdings's return on equity of 3.35%.

Riskified has a consensus price target of $5.91, signalling upside risk potential of 26.74%. On the other hand SEMrush Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $17.57 which suggests that it could grow by 76.6%. Given that SEMrush Holdings has higher upside potential than Riskified, analysts believe SEMrush Holdings is more attractive than Riskified.

Riskified has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SEMrush Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Riskified has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SEMrush Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Riskified pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SEMrush Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Riskified quarterly revenues are $93.5M, which are smaller than SEMrush Holdings quarterly revenues of $102.6M. Riskified's net income of -$4.1M is lower than SEMrush Holdings's net income of $3.3M. Notably, Riskified's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SEMrush Holdings's PE ratio is 199.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Riskified is 2.43x versus 3.93x for SEMrush Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.