RGA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Lincoln National has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 33.18%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $251.36, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $39.18 which suggests that it could grow by 3.96%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.426%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 4.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.75x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 2.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.61x versus 0.36x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Primerica has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 21.2%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Primerica's return on equity of 22.24%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $251.36, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Primerica has an analysts' consensus of $313.57 which suggests that it could grow by 7.94%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Primerica, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Primerica.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Primerica has a beta of 1.125, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.492%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Primerica offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.04 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Primerica pays out 23.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Primerica quarterly revenues of $788.1M. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Primerica's net income of $167.1M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.75x while Primerica's PE ratio is 21.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.61x versus 3.20x for Primerica. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of -0.45%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $251.36, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $125.69 which suggests that it could grow by 9.91%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.891%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 4.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is higher than Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.75x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 15.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.61x versus 0.58x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 2.85% compared to Reinsurance Group of America's net margin of 10.88%. Reinsurance Group of America's return on equity of 7.07% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.03%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a consensus price target of $251.36, signalling upside risk potential of 24.83%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $91.85 which suggests that it could grow by 10.61%. Given that Reinsurance Group of America has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Reinsurance Group of America is more attractive than Unum Group.

Reinsurance Group of America has a beta of 0.906, which suggesting that the stock is 9.382% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.503%.

Reinsurance Group of America has a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.75%. Unum Group offers a yield of 1.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Reinsurance Group of America pays 31.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Reinsurance Group of America quarterly revenues are $5.2B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Reinsurance Group of America's net income of $148M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $348.7M. Notably, Reinsurance Group of America's price-to-earnings ratio is 18.75x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Reinsurance Group of America is 0.61x versus 1.22x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.