PRU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American International Group has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 12.55%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97% beat American International Group's return on equity of -3.02%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $125.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand American International Group has an analysts' consensus of $84.62 which suggests that it could grow by 0.84%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than American International Group, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than American International Group.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American International Group has a beta of 0.984, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.619%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. American International Group offers a yield of 1.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. American International Group pays out -72.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than American International Group quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M is lower than American International Group's net income of $898M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while American International Group's PE ratio is 11.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 1.67x for American International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 62.3%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $125.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $64.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.67%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.235%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Globe Life has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 17.4%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97% beat Globe Life's return on equity of 21.68%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $125.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand Globe Life has an analysts' consensus of $141.09 which suggests that it could grow by 8.62%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Globe Life, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Globe Life.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Globe Life has a beta of 0.771, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.884%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. Globe Life offers a yield of 0.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Globe Life pays out 7.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are larger than Globe Life quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M is lower than Globe Life's net income of $255.2M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while Globe Life's PE ratio is 10.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 2.11x for Globe Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of -0.45% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 6.92%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.21%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $125.69, signalling upside risk potential of 9.91%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $95.86 which suggests that it could grow by 14.47%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, which suggesting that the stock is 27.891% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.545%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.59%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $12.6B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.4B. Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.32x while MetLife's PE ratio is 14.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 0.85x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.