PRU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 3.62%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43% beat Allstate's return on equity of 19.96%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $112.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.08%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $227.47 which suggests that it could grow by 13.4%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.325, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 67.546%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Prudential Financial's net income of $707M is higher than Allstate's net income of $595M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Allstate's PE ratio is 13.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.63x versus 0.82x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of -11.55%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 12.57%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $112.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.08%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $59.88 which suggests that it could grow by 0.89%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2.3B. Prudential Financial's net income of $707M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of -$268M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 7.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.63x versus 0.54x for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 5.17%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.75%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $112.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.08%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $90.86 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 0.853, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.655%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Prudential Financial's net income of $707M is lower than MetLife's net income of $945M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while MetLife's PE ratio is 13.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.63x versus 0.77x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radian Group has a net margin of 5.22% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 45.5%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 7.43% beat Radian Group's return on equity of 13.07%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $112.79, signalling upside risk potential of 6.08%. On the other hand Radian Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.17 which suggests that it could grow by 7.58%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.075, which suggesting that the stock is 7.503% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radian Group has a beta of 0.710, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.994%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.94%. Radian Group offers a yield of 2.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Prudential Financial pays 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Radian Group pays out 25.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $13.5B, which are larger than Radian Group quarterly revenues of $317.7M. Prudential Financial's net income of $707M is higher than Radian Group's net income of $144.6M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.86x while Radian Group's PE ratio is 8.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.63x versus 3.97x for Radian Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.