PRU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Life has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of -18.21%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat Abacus Life's return on equity of -5.9%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $130.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand Abacus Life has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 87.75%. Given that Abacus Life has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe Abacus Life is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Life has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Abacus Life offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Life pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Abacus Life quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is higher than Abacus Life's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Abacus Life's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 4.91x for Abacus Life. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 8.97%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of -25.86%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $130.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $51.88 which suggests that it could grow by 8.64%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.738%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out -9.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $2B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is higher than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $176M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 11.42%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $130.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.65 which suggests that it could grow by 18.49%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.977, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.346%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 2.29% compared to Prudential Financial's net margin of 7.35%. Prudential Financial's return on equity of 13.78% beat MetLife's return on equity of 13.1%.

Prudential Financial has a consensus price target of $130.23, signalling upside risk potential of 9.96%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $93.92 which suggests that it could grow by 13.41%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Prudential Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Prudential Financial.

Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.311, which suggesting that the stock is 31.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.077, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.692%.

Prudential Financial has a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.39%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Prudential Financial pays 74.2% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 111.79% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MetLife's is not.

Prudential Financial quarterly revenues are $19.5B, which are larger than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.3B. Prudential Financial's net income of $448M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Prudential Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.53x while MetLife's PE ratio is 16.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prudential Financial is 0.58x versus 0.85x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.