BHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Goldman Sachs Group has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 29.64%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat The Goldman Sachs Group's return on equity of 11.93%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand The Goldman Sachs Group has an analysts' consensus of $638.35 which suggests that it could grow by 12.95%. Given that The Goldman Sachs Group has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe The Goldman Sachs Group is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Goldman Sachs Group has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.045%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Goldman Sachs Group offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.00 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. The Goldman Sachs Group pays out 31.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than The Goldman Sachs Group quarterly revenues of $13.9B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than The Goldman Sachs Group's net income of $4.1B. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while The Goldman Sachs Group's PE ratio is 13.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 3.52x for The Goldman Sachs Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 33.18%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $39.18 which suggests that it could grow by 9.11%. Given that Brighthouse Financial has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Brighthouse Financial is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.764, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.426%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.01% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.35x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetLife has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of 6.92%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat MetLife's return on equity of 15.21%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand MetLife has an analysts' consensus of $95.43 which suggests that it could grow by 15.87%. Given that MetLife has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe MetLife is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetLife has a beta of 1.045, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.545%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MetLife offers a yield of 2.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. MetLife pays out 39.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than MetLife quarterly revenues of $18.4B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is lower than MetLife's net income of $1.3B. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while MetLife's PE ratio is 13.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.84x for MetLife. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prudential Financial has a net margin of 62.3% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -0.45%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05% beat Prudential Financial's return on equity of 8.97%.

Brighthouse Financial has a consensus price target of $64.33, signalling upside risk potential of 10.96%. On the other hand Prudential Financial has an analysts' consensus of $125.69 which suggests that it could grow by 13.99%. Given that Prudential Financial has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Prudential Financial is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 1.112, which suggesting that the stock is 11.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prudential Financial has a beta of 1.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.891%.

Brighthouse Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prudential Financial offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.35 per share. Brighthouse Financial pays 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Prudential Financial pays out 69.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Prudential Financial quarterly revenues of $12.6B. Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M is higher than Prudential Financial's net income of -$57M. Notably, Brighthouse Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.24x while Prudential Financial's PE ratio is 14.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Brighthouse Financial is -- versus 0.56x for Prudential Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.