Financhill
Sell
30

ABL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$8.38
Seasonality move :
-14.93%
Day range:
$8.15 - $8.32
52-week range:
$6.34 - $12.40
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
70.19x
P/S ratio:
5.29x
P/B ratio:
1.88x
Volume:
277.5K
Avg. volume:
428.3K
1-year change:
-31.14%
Market cap:
$799M
Revenue:
$111.9M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.21

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$40.3M $0.16 49.17% 1633.3% $13.60
AAME
Atlantic American
-- -- -- -- --
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
$2.3B $4.55 64.42% -34.69% $59.33
CIA
Citizens
$58.9M $0.05 2.12% -44.44% $5.00
GNW
Genworth Financial
-- $0.21 -- -32.26% $8.00
LNC
Lincoln National
$4.7B $1.52 2.84% -60.24% $36.91
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$8.25 $13.60 $799M 70.19x $0.00 0% 5.29x
AAME
Atlantic American
$1.69 -- $34.5M 18.85x $0.02 1.18% 0.18x
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
$58.41 $59.33 $3.4B 11.32x $0.00 0% --
CIA
Citizens
$3.81 $5.00 $190.1M 13.14x $0.00 0% 0.79x
GNW
Genworth Financial
$6.91 $8.00 $2.9B 14.10x $0.00 0% 0.42x
LNC
Lincoln National
$33.99 $36.91 $5.8B 1.85x $0.45 5.3% 0.33x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
ABL
Abacus Global Management
41.13% -0.396 23.84% 1.20x
AAME
Atlantic American
27.49% -0.480 119.99% 3.51x
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
38.88% 0.792 109.49% --
CIA
Citizens
-- 1.625 -- 5.45x
GNW
Genworth Financial
14.85% 1.172 38.75% --
LNC
Lincoln National
43.46% 1.285 99.47% 5.37x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
ABL
Abacus Global Management
$26M $6.6M -3.21% -5.9% -4.68% -$52.5M
AAME
Atlantic American
-- -- -3.03% -4.14% 2.8% $9.5M
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
-- -- 4.87% 8.05% 80.97% -$118M
CIA
Citizens
-- -- 10.06% 7.63% 5.85% $10.7M
GNW
Genworth Financial
-- -- 1.97% 2.3% 8.55% $34M
LNC
Lincoln National
-- -- 23.23% 41.29% 42.94% $222M

Abacus Global Management vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns ABL or AAME?

    Atlantic American has a net margin of -18.21% compared to Abacus Global Management's net margin of 0.84%. Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9% beat Atlantic American's return on equity of -4.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    92.23% -$0.07 $438.2M
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    -- $0.02 $137.4M
  • What do Analysts Say About ABL or AAME?

    Abacus Global Management has a consensus price target of $13.60, signalling upside risk potential of 64.85%. On the other hand Atlantic American has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Atlantic American, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Atlantic American.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    0 0 0
  • Is ABL or AAME More Risky?

    Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atlantic American has a beta of 0.653, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.734%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or AAME?

    Abacus Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Atlantic American offers a yield of 1.18% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Abacus Global Management pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Atlantic American pays out -18.91% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or AAME?

    Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Atlantic American quarterly revenues of $49M. Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Atlantic American's net income of $412K. Notably, Abacus Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.19x while Atlantic American's PE ratio is 18.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management is 5.29x versus 0.18x for Atlantic American. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    5.29x 70.19x $28.1M -$5.1M
    AAME
    Atlantic American
    0.18x 18.85x $49M $412K
  • Which has Higher Returns ABL or BHF?

    Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of -18.21% compared to Abacus Global Management's net margin of 62.3%. Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    92.23% -$0.07 $438.2M
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- $10.79 $8.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ABL or BHF?

    Abacus Global Management has a consensus price target of $13.60, signalling upside risk potential of 64.85%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $59.33 which suggests that it could grow by 1.58%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    1 6 1
  • Is ABL or BHF More Risky?

    Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or BHF?

    Abacus Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or BHF?

    Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, Abacus Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.19x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management is 5.29x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    5.29x 70.19x $28.1M -$5.1M
    BHF
    Brighthouse Financial
    -- 11.32x $1.1B $671M
  • Which has Higher Returns ABL or CIA?

    Citizens has a net margin of -18.21% compared to Abacus Global Management's net margin of 5.71%. Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9% beat Citizens's return on equity of 7.63%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    92.23% -$0.07 $438.2M
    CIA
    Citizens
    -- $0.07 $80.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About ABL or CIA?

    Abacus Global Management has a consensus price target of $13.60, signalling upside risk potential of 64.85%. On the other hand Citizens has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.23%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Citizens.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
    CIA
    Citizens
    0 0 0
  • Is ABL or CIA More Risky?

    Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens has a beta of 0.444, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.643%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or CIA?

    Abacus Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Citizens offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or CIA?

    Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Citizens quarterly revenues of $63.5M. Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Citizens's net income of $3.6M. Notably, Abacus Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.19x while Citizens's PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management is 5.29x versus 0.79x for Citizens. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    5.29x 70.19x $28.1M -$5.1M
    CIA
    Citizens
    0.79x 13.14x $63.5M $3.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns ABL or GNW?

    Genworth Financial has a net margin of -18.21% compared to Abacus Global Management's net margin of 3.04%. Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    92.23% -$0.07 $438.2M
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    -- $0.13 $11.2B
  • What do Analysts Say About ABL or GNW?

    Abacus Global Management has a consensus price target of $13.60, signalling upside risk potential of 64.85%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    0 1 0
  • Is ABL or GNW More Risky?

    Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.881%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or GNW?

    Abacus Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Abacus Global Management pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or GNW?

    Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Abacus Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.19x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 14.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management is 5.29x versus 0.42x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    5.29x 70.19x $28.1M -$5.1M
    GNW
    Genworth Financial
    0.42x 14.10x $1.8B $54M
  • Which has Higher Returns ABL or LNC?

    Lincoln National has a net margin of -18.21% compared to Abacus Global Management's net margin of 33.18%. Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    92.23% -$0.07 $438.2M
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    -- $9.63 $14.6B
  • What do Analysts Say About ABL or LNC?

    Abacus Global Management has a consensus price target of $13.60, signalling upside risk potential of 64.85%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.91 which suggests that it could grow by 8.59%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Lincoln National.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    3 0 0
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    1 10 0
  • Is ABL or LNC More Risky?

    Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.054%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock ABL or LNC?

    Abacus Global Management has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Abacus Global Management pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios ABL or LNC?

    Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues are $28.1M, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Abacus Global Management's price-to-earnings ratio is 70.19x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Abacus Global Management is 5.29x versus 0.33x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    ABL
    Abacus Global Management
    5.29x 70.19x $28.1M -$5.1M
    LNC
    Lincoln National
    0.33x 1.85x $5.1B $1.7B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?
Is BYD a Threat To Tesla Shareholders?

BYD (OTC:BYDDY) has rocketed to the top of China’s booming…

CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?
CVX Vs XOM Stock, Which Energy Play Is Best?

Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) are two of the…

Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?
Is it Safe to Invest in Google With OpenAI Threats?

For the last 20 years, Google parent company Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOG,…

Stock Ideas

Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x

Buy
61
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Buy
60
RGC alert for May 8

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 10.54% over the past day.

Buy
92
TPB alert for May 8

Turning Point Brands [TPB] is down 6.67% over the past day.

Buy
74
LIVN alert for May 8

LivaNova PLC [LIVN] is up 1.33% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock