CIA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Abacus Global Management has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of -18.21%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Abacus Global Management's return on equity of -5.9%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Abacus Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $13.60 which suggests that it could grow by 65.85%. Given that Abacus Global Management has higher upside potential than Citizens, analysts believe Abacus Global Management is more attractive than Citizens.

Citizens has a beta of 0.444, which suggesting that the stock is 55.643% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Abacus Global Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Abacus Global Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Abacus Global Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are larger than Abacus Global Management quarterly revenues of $28.1M. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is higher than Abacus Global Management's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.07x while Abacus Global Management's PE ratio is 70.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 5.26x for Abacus Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Brighthouse Financial has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of 62.3%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 8.05%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Brighthouse Financial has an analysts' consensus of $59.33 which suggests that it could grow by 3.39%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Brighthouse Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Brighthouse Financial.

Citizens has a beta of 0.444, which suggesting that the stock is 55.643% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.958, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.233%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Brighthouse Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial pays out 26.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Brighthouse Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Brighthouse Financial quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is lower than Brighthouse Financial's net income of $671M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.07x while Brighthouse Financial's PE ratio is 11.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus -- for Brighthouse Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Genworth Financial has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of 3.04%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Genworth Financial's return on equity of 2.3%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Genworth Financial has an analysts' consensus of $8.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.45%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Genworth Financial, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Genworth Financial.

Citizens has a beta of 0.444, which suggesting that the stock is 55.643% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Genworth Financial has a beta of 0.991, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.881%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Genworth Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Genworth Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Genworth Financial quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is lower than Genworth Financial's net income of $54M. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.07x while Genworth Financial's PE ratio is 14.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 0.42x for Genworth Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lincoln National has a net margin of 5.71% compared to Citizens's net margin of 33.18%. Citizens's return on equity of 7.63% beat Lincoln National's return on equity of 41.29%.

Citizens has a consensus price target of $5.00, signalling upside risk potential of 22.55%. On the other hand Lincoln National has an analysts' consensus of $36.91 which suggests that it could grow by 11.91%. Given that Citizens has higher upside potential than Lincoln National, analysts believe Citizens is more attractive than Lincoln National.

Citizens has a beta of 0.444, which suggesting that the stock is 55.643% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lincoln National has a beta of 1.421, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.054%.

Citizens has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lincoln National offers a yield of 5.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Citizens pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National pays out 12.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Lincoln National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Citizens quarterly revenues are $63.5M, which are smaller than Lincoln National quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Citizens's net income of $3.6M is lower than Lincoln National's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Citizens's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.07x while Lincoln National's PE ratio is 1.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Citizens is 0.85x versus 0.32x for Lincoln National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.