UNM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 7.16%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3% beat Allstate's return on equity of 23.5%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $82.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $223.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.46%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Unum Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.975%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.92 per share. Unum Group pays 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out -548.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.6B. Unum Group's net income of $645.7M is lower than Allstate's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.13x versus 0.80x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

AMERISAFE has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 18.2%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3% beat AMERISAFE's return on equity of 19.88%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $82.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand AMERISAFE has an analysts' consensus of $56.33 which suggests that it could grow by 10.26%. Given that AMERISAFE has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe AMERISAFE is more attractive than Unum Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison AMERISAFE has a beta of 0.349, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.115%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. AMERISAFE offers a yield of 2.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.37 per share. Unum Group pays 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. AMERISAFE pays out 150.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but AMERISAFE's is not.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than AMERISAFE quarterly revenues of $78.7M. Unum Group's net income of $645.7M is higher than AMERISAFE's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while AMERISAFE's PE ratio is 15.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.13x versus 3.11x for AMERISAFE. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 0.82%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $82.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $41.80 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than CNO Financial Group, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than CNO Financial Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.924%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Unum Group pays 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Unum Group's net income of $645.7M is higher than CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.13x versus 0.95x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 20.17% compared to Unum Group's net margin of 0.44%. Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

Unum Group has a consensus price target of $82.09, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $55.14 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Unum Group, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Unum Group.

Unum Group has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.819% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.361%.

Unum Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Unum Group pays 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Unum Group quarterly revenues are $3.2B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Unum Group's net income of $645.7M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Unum Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.11x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Unum Group is 1.13x versus 1.61x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.