AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens Financial has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of --. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Citizens Financial's return on equity of --.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Citizens Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.79%. Given that Citizens Financial has more downside risk than Aflac, analysts believe Aflac is more attractive than Citizens Financial.

Aflac has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Citizens Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Citizens Financial quarterly revenues of --. Aflac's net income of -$93M is higher than Citizens Financial's net income of --. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Citizens Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.50x versus -- for Citizens Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 0.82%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 11.83%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $41.80 which suggests that it could grow by 7.79%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 1.039, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.924%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than CNO Financial Group's net income of $9.3M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 15.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.50x versus 0.95x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 0.44%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -4.42%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $55.14 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.614, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.361%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $327.5M. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than Trupanion's net income of $1.4M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.50x versus 1.61x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of -3.06% compared to Aflac's net margin of 20.17%. Aflac's return on equity of 16% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 17.3%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $105.92, signalling downside risk potential of -0.53%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $82.09 which suggests that it could grow by 9.48%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.997, which suggesting that the stock is 0.344% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.819%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.88%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 20.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 21.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3B, which are smaller than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of -$93M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $645.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.04x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 8.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.50x versus 1.13x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.