AFL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Citizens Financial has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of --. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Citizens Financial's return on equity of --.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $106.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.51%. On the other hand Citizens Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -40.79%. Given that Aflac has higher upside potential than Citizens Financial, analysts believe Aflac is more attractive than Citizens Financial.

Aflac has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Citizens Financial has a beta of 0.057, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.271%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Citizens Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Citizens Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Citizens Financial quarterly revenues of --. Aflac's net income of $29M is higher than Citizens Financial's net income of --. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.16x while Citizens Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.36x versus -- for Citizens Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CNO Financial Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of 1.36%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat CNO Financial Group's return on equity of 12.2%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $106.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.51%. On the other hand CNO Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $44.20 which suggests that it could grow by 15.77%. Given that CNO Financial Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe CNO Financial Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CNO Financial Group has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.513%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. CNO Financial Group offers a yield of 1.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. CNO Financial Group pays out 16.76% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than CNO Financial Group quarterly revenues of $1B. Aflac's net income of $29M is higher than CNO Financial Group's net income of $13.7M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.16x while CNO Financial Group's PE ratio is 13.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.36x versus 0.94x for CNO Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of -0.43%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -1.34%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $106.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.51%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.25 which suggests that it could grow by 17.31%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.723, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.33%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Aflac's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $342M. Aflac's net income of $29M is higher than Trupanion's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.16x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.36x versus 1.43x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Unum Group has a net margin of 0.84% compared to Aflac's net margin of 5.86%. Aflac's return on equity of 14.16% beat Unum Group's return on equity of 14.62%.

Aflac has a consensus price target of $106.00, signalling upside risk potential of 2.51%. On the other hand Unum Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.92 which suggests that it could grow by 17.6%. Given that Unum Group has higher upside potential than Aflac, analysts believe Unum Group is more attractive than Aflac.

Aflac has a beta of 0.841, which suggesting that the stock is 15.895% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Unum Group has a beta of 0.382, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.843%.

Aflac has a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.09%. Unum Group offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Aflac pays 19.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Unum Group pays out 16.67% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aflac quarterly revenues are $3.5B, which are larger than Unum Group quarterly revenues of $3.2B. Aflac's net income of $29M is lower than Unum Group's net income of $189.1M. Notably, Aflac's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.16x while Unum Group's PE ratio is 9.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aflac is 3.36x versus 1.15x for Unum Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.