QUAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Deere & has a net margin of -3.66% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 11.5%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -80.48% beat Deere &'s return on equity of 31.44%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $10.15, signalling upside risk potential of 56.4%. On the other hand Deere & has an analysts' consensus of $464.48 which suggests that it could grow by 13.29%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Deere &, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Deere &.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Deere & has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.054%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Deere & offers a yield of 1.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.62 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere & pays out 22.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Deere &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $674.8M, which are smaller than Deere & quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Quad/Graphics's net income of -$24.7M is lower than Deere &'s net income of $1.2B. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Deere &'s PE ratio is 16.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.11x versus 2.25x for Deere &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve has a net margin of -3.66% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 5.15%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -80.48% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.38%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $10.15, signalling upside risk potential of 56.4%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $65.20 which suggests that it could grow by 16.59%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Flowserve, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Flowserve.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.803%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 56.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $674.8M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Quad/Graphics's net income of -$24.7M is lower than Flowserve's net income of $58.4M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Flowserve's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.11x versus 1.72x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rockwell Automation has a net margin of -3.66% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 11.75%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -80.48% beat Rockwell Automation's return on equity of 25.84%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $10.15, signalling upside risk potential of 56.4%. On the other hand Rockwell Automation has an analysts' consensus of $296.08 which suggests that it could grow by 5.91%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Rockwell Automation, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Rockwell Automation.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rockwell Automation has a beta of 1.357, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.749%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Rockwell Automation offers a yield of 1.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.31 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation pays out 59.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Rockwell Automation's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $674.8M, which are smaller than Rockwell Automation quarterly revenues of $2B. Quad/Graphics's net income of -$24.7M is lower than Rockwell Automation's net income of $239.1M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rockwell Automation's PE ratio is 33.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.11x versus 3.87x for Rockwell Automation. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Stanley Black & Decker has a net margin of -3.66% compared to Quad/Graphics's net margin of 2.43%. Quad/Graphics's return on equity of -80.48% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity of -2.29%.

Quad/Graphics has a consensus price target of $10.15, signalling upside risk potential of 56.4%. On the other hand Stanley Black & Decker has an analysts' consensus of $102.96 which suggests that it could grow by 26.24%. Given that Quad/Graphics has higher upside potential than Stanley Black & Decker, analysts believe Quad/Graphics is more attractive than Stanley Black & Decker.

Quad/Graphics has a beta of 1.590, which suggesting that the stock is 58.996% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.240, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.002%.

Quad/Graphics has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.08%. Stanley Black & Decker offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. Quad/Graphics pays -0.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Stanley Black & Decker pays out -155.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Quad/Graphics quarterly revenues are $674.8M, which are smaller than Stanley Black & Decker quarterly revenues of $3.8B. Quad/Graphics's net income of -$24.7M is lower than Stanley Black & Decker's net income of $91.1M. Notably, Quad/Graphics's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Stanley Black & Decker's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Quad/Graphics is 0.11x versus 0.80x for Stanley Black & Decker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.