CR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowserve has a net margin of 19.21% compared to Crane's net margin of 6.46%. Crane's return on equity of 21.44% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.71%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $179.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.31%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $61.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.36%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.211, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.06%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $557.6M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Crane's net income of $107.1M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $73.9M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 24.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 4.82x versus 1.50x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 19.21% compared to Crane's net margin of 23.49%. Crane's return on equity of 21.44% beat Graco's return on equity of 19.79%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $179.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.31%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $88.03 which suggests that it could grow by 3.48%. Given that Graco has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe Graco is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 1.094, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.38%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Graco offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $557.6M, which are larger than Graco quarterly revenues of $528.3M. Crane's net income of $107.1M is lower than Graco's net income of $124.1M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Graco's PE ratio is 30.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 4.82x versus 6.81x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 19.21% compared to Crane's net margin of -814.55%. Crane's return on equity of 21.44% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $179.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.31%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $557.6M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Crane's net income of $107.1M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 4.82x versus 9.30x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 19.21% compared to Crane's net margin of -11.09%. Crane's return on equity of 21.44% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Crane has a consensus price target of $179.36, signalling upside risk potential of 2.31%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 275.53%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Crane, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Crane.

Crane has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.542%.

Crane has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.48%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crane pays 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Crane's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crane quarterly revenues are $557.6M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Crane's net income of $107.1M is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Crane's price-to-earnings ratio is 30.38x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crane is 4.82x versus 0.25x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.