OPTT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -161.83% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of 0.21%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 153.22%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, which suggesting that the stock is 163.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.439, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.872%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $35.5M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Broadwind's net income of $74K. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 12.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 9.22x versus 0.25x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -161.83% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of 2.48%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 361.1%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, which suggesting that the stock is 163.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.337, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.693%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $203K. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 9.22x versus 1.00x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of -161.83% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of -7.62%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48% beat Intevac's return on equity of -7.77%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 101.15%. Given that Intevac has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Intevac is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, which suggesting that the stock is 163.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.663, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.734%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than Intevac quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M is lower than Intevac's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 9.22x versus 1.41x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -161.83% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of -15.94%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.79%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 232.12%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, which suggesting that the stock is 163.201% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.185, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.531%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $2.4M, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $2.8M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$443K. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 9.22x versus 0.36x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.