BURU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -25746.56% compared to Nuburu's net margin of 1.78%. Nuburu's return on equity of -- beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Nuburu has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 419.5%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Nuburu.

Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.09%.

Nuburu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuburu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuburu quarterly revenues are $49.3K, which are smaller than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Nuburu's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuburu is 0.53x versus 0.78x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of -25746.56% compared to Nuburu's net margin of -289.48%. Nuburu's return on equity of -- beat Intevac's return on equity of -37.3%.

Nuburu has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75%. Given that Intevac has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe Intevac is more attractive than Nuburu.

Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.118%.

Nuburu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Nuburu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuburu quarterly revenues are $49.3K, which are smaller than Intevac quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M is higher than Intevac's net income of -$32.8M. Notably, Nuburu's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuburu is 0.53x versus 1.67x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -25746.56% compared to Nuburu's net margin of -814.55%. Nuburu's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Nuburu has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nuburu has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Nuburu is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Nuburu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuburu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuburu quarterly revenues are $49.3K, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Nuburu's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuburu is 0.53x versus 7.76x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -25746.56% compared to Nuburu's net margin of -11.09%. Nuburu's return on equity of -- beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Nuburu has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 336.57%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Nuburu, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Nuburu.

Nuburu has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Nuburu has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nuburu pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nuburu quarterly revenues are $49.3K, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Nuburu's net income of -$4.4M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Nuburu's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nuburu is 0.53x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.