SIF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -7.32% compared to SIFCO Industries's net margin of -1%. SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08% beat Broadwind's return on equity of -1.23%.

SIFCO Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 294.1%. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 143.16%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Broadwind.

SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.607, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.721%.

SIFCO Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIFCO Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues are $19M, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $36.8M. SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$370K. Notably, SIFCO Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 35.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIFCO Industries is 0.26x versus 0.26x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -7.32% compared to SIFCO Industries's net margin of 4.33%. SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -0.26%.

SIFCO Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 294.1%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 428.93%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than SIFCO Industries, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than SIFCO Industries.

SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 0.736, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.36%.

SIFCO Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIFCO Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues are $19M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.3M. SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $360K. Notably, SIFCO Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIFCO Industries is 0.26x versus 0.68x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -7.32% compared to SIFCO Industries's net margin of -814.55%. SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

SIFCO Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 294.1%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.642, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 164.159%.

SIFCO Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIFCO Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues are $19M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, SIFCO Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIFCO Industries is 0.26x versus 7.69x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Power Solutions International has a net margin of -7.32% compared to SIFCO Industries's net margin of 14.09%. SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.08% beat Power Solutions International's return on equity of 184.91%.

SIFCO Industries has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 294.1%. On the other hand Power Solutions International has an analysts' consensus of $64.00 which suggests that it could grow by 51.05%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Power Solutions International, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Power Solutions International.

SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.035, which suggesting that the stock is 3.542% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Power Solutions International has a beta of 1.087, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.692%.

SIFCO Industries has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Power Solutions International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. SIFCO Industries pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Power Solutions International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues are $19M, which are smaller than Power Solutions International quarterly revenues of $135.4M. SIFCO Industries's net income of -$1.4M is lower than Power Solutions International's net income of $19.1M. Notably, SIFCO Industries's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Power Solutions International's PE ratio is 12.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SIFCO Industries is 0.26x versus 1.89x for Power Solutions International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.