PNNT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 79.18% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 99.99%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.65% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 13.51%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.41%. Given that Pennant Park Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe Pennant Park Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.035%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.27%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 6.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.54 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 93.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Pennant Park Investment's is not.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $11.9M, which are smaller than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $16.8M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $9.5M is lower than Gladstone Investment's net income of $17.9M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.87x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.72x versus 8.58x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 79.18% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 91.13%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.65% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 7.87%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of $15.25 which suggests that it could grow by 1.67%. Given that Golub Capital BDC has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe Golub Capital BDC is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.520, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.032%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.27%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $11.9M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $86.7M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $9.5M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $79M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.87x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 13.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.72x versus 12.42x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MidCap Financial Investment has a net margin of 79.18% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 95.41%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.65% beat MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 8.33%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand MidCap Financial Investment has an analysts' consensus of $13.88 which suggests that it could grow by 6.65%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Pennant Park Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Pennant Park Investment.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 0.994, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.59900000000001%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.27%. MidCap Financial Investment offers a yield of 11.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. MidCap Financial Investment pays out 141.29% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $11.9M, which are smaller than MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues of $31.8M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $9.5M is lower than MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $30.3M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.87x while MidCap Financial Investment's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.72x versus 9.75x for MidCap Financial Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 79.18% compared to Pennant Park Investment's net margin of 90.2%. Pennant Park Investment's return on equity of 9.65% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 0.61%.

Pennant Park Investment has a consensus price target of $6.75, signalling upside risk potential of 0.3%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of $14.08 which suggests that it could fall by -2.87%. Given that Pennant Park Investment has higher upside potential than Oaktree Specialty Lending, analysts believe Pennant Park Investment is more attractive than Oaktree Specialty Lending.

Pennant Park Investment has a beta of 1.015, which suggesting that the stock is 1.479% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 0.706, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.353%.

Pennant Park Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 14.27%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Pennant Park Investment pays 134.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pennant Park Investment quarterly revenues are $11.9M, which are larger than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of -$40.2M. Pennant Park Investment's net income of $9.5M is higher than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of -$36.2M. Notably, Pennant Park Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.87x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 111.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pennant Park Investment is 7.72x versus 22.13x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.