OC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fortune Brands Innovations has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 4.98%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.77, signalling upside risk potential of 22.27%. On the other hand Fortune Brands Innovations has an analysts' consensus of $65.72 which suggests that it could grow by 26.9%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.028%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Fortune Brands Innovations offers a yield of 1.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations pays out 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues of $1B. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.41x while Fortune Brands Innovations's PE ratio is 15.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.08x versus 1.42x for Fortune Brands Innovations. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Griffon has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 9.28%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.77, signalling upside risk potential of 22.27%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 38.14%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.327%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Griffon offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.41x while Griffon's PE ratio is 14.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.08x versus 1.32x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of 4.53%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 2.06%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.77, signalling upside risk potential of 22.27%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $33.75 which suggests that it could grow by 69.34%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Owens-Corning, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Owens-Corning.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.012, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.171%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $452.5M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Quanex Building Products's net income of $20.5M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.41x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 33.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.08x versus 0.53x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Lab USA has a net margin of -3.68% compared to Owens-Corning's net margin of -49.46%. Owens-Corning's return on equity of 4.81% beat Rocket Lab USA's return on equity of -47.64%.

Owens-Corning has a consensus price target of $169.77, signalling upside risk potential of 22.27%. On the other hand Rocket Lab USA has an analysts' consensus of $27.89 which suggests that it could grow by 5.63%. Given that Owens-Corning has higher upside potential than Rocket Lab USA, analysts believe Owens-Corning is more attractive than Rocket Lab USA.

Owens-Corning has a beta of 1.343, which suggesting that the stock is 34.341% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Lab USA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Owens-Corning has a quarterly dividend of $0.69 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.86%. Rocket Lab USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Owens-Corning pays 32.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Lab USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Owens-Corning's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Owens-Corning quarterly revenues are $2.5B, which are larger than Rocket Lab USA quarterly revenues of $122.6M. Owens-Corning's net income of -$93M is lower than Rocket Lab USA's net income of -$60.6M. Notably, Owens-Corning's price-to-earnings ratio is 49.41x while Rocket Lab USA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Owens-Corning is 1.08x versus 28.32x for Rocket Lab USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.