GFF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Limbach Holdings has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of 7.67%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 23.42%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 41.73%. On the other hand Limbach Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $125.50 which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Griffon has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.953%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Limbach Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Limbach Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues of $133.1M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Limbach Holdings's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Limbach Holdings's PE ratio is 44.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.28x versus 2.84x for Limbach Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of -3.72%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 1.61%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 41.73%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $34.75 which suggests that it could grow by 100.17%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Griffon, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Griffon.

Griffon has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.015, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.491%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $400M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 28.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.28x versus 0.48x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of -211.96%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 41.73%. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14416.13%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Griffon, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Griffon.

Griffon has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 1.167, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.698%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.28x versus 0.59x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of 9.28% compared to Griffon's net margin of -18.28%. Griffon's return on equity of 105.75% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Griffon has a consensus price target of $96.71, signalling upside risk potential of 41.73%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Techprecision.

Griffon has a beta of 1.172, which suggesting that the stock is 17.215% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.041, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 95.929%.

Griffon has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.97%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Griffon pays 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Griffon quarterly revenues are $611.7M, which are larger than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Griffon's net income of $56.8M is higher than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Griffon's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.13x while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Griffon is 1.28x versus 1.10x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.