Will Palantir Crash?
AI and data analytics software major Palantir (NASDAQ:PLTR) has been…
Sell
9
FBIN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.90
Seasonality move
:
7.01%
Day range:
$50.02 - $51.26
52-week range:
$47.21 - $90.54
Dividend yield:
1.95%
P/E ratio:
14.76x
P/S ratio:
1.38x
P/B ratio:
2.63x
Volume:
1.3M
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
-26.94%
Market cap:
$6.1B
Revenue:
$4.6B
EPS (TTM):
$3.41
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$1.1B | $0.66 | -3.72% | -8.23% | $65.72 |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GFF
Griffon
|
$618.2M | $1.09 | 0.33% | 78.37% | $96.71 |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$50.33 | $65.72 | $6.1B | 14.76x | $0.25 | 1.95% | 1.38x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$13.58 | -- | $13.1M | -- | $0.03 | 1.4% | 0.50x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$2.92 | -- | $38M | 20.86x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.48x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$40.88 | -- | $115.7M | 15.25x | $0.25 | 2.32% | 2.36x |
|
GFF
Griffon
|
$67.69 | $96.71 | $3.2B | 14.01x | $0.18 | 1.02% | 1.27x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$4.49 | -- | $10M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.10x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
56.17% | 0.666 | 39.98% | 0.62x |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
-- | 0.716 | -- | 2.34x |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
40.03% | 1.707 | 36.86% | 1.51x |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
-- | 0.602 | -- | 1.69x |
|
GFF
Griffon
|
87.74% | 2.005 | 45.51% | 1.30x |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
94.83% | 13.285 | 3155.74% | 0.17x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations
|
$454.7M | $121.8M | 8.19% | 18.2% | 9.49% | -$112.6M |
|
CVR
Chicago Rivet & Machine
|
$1.7M | $70.2K | -19.72% | -19.72% | 0.97% | -$2.1M |
|
CVU
CPI Aerostructures
|
$1.6M | -$1.2M | 4.25% | 7.38% | -7.69% | -$2.8M |
|
ESP
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics
|
$2.9M | $1.8M | 16.58% | 16.58% | 17% | $10.5M |
|
GFF
Griffon
|
$252.2M | $101.2M | 13.25% | 105.75% | 16.77% | $2.7M |
|
GPUS
Hyperscale Data
|
$5.3M | -$6.4M | -50.34% | -305.92% | -3.3% | -$6.8M |
Fortune Brands Innovations vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVR?
Chicago Rivet & Machine has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 5.54%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2% beat Chicago Rivet & Machine's return on equity of -19.72%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations44.01% $0.42 $5.3B CVRChicago Rivet & Machine22.88% $0.42 $20.4M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $65.72, signalling upside risk potential of 30.58%. On the other hand Chicago Rivet & Machine has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Chicago Rivet & Machine, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Chicago Rivet & Machine.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations6 11 0 CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVR More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Rivet & Machine has a beta of 0.127, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.265%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Chicago Rivet & Machine offers a yield of 1.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Rivet & Machine pays out -5.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVR?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Chicago Rivet & Machine quarterly revenues of $7.2M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M is higher than Chicago Rivet & Machine's net income of $401K. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Chicago Rivet & Machine's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.38x versus 0.50x for Chicago Rivet & Machine. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.38x 14.76x $1B $51.4M CVRChicago Rivet & Machine0.50x -- $7.2M $401K
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or CVU?
CPI Aerostructures has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -8.6%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2% beat CPI Aerostructures's return on equity of 7.38%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations44.01% $0.42 $5.3B CVUCPI Aerostructures10.71% -$0.10 $41.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $65.72, signalling upside risk potential of 30.58%. On the other hand CPI Aerostructures has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.99%. Given that CPI Aerostructures has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe CPI Aerostructures is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations6 11 0 CVUCPI Aerostructures0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or CVU More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CPI Aerostructures has a beta of 1.202, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.156%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. CPI Aerostructures offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. CPI Aerostructures pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or CVU?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than CPI Aerostructures quarterly revenues of $15.4M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M is higher than CPI Aerostructures's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while CPI Aerostructures's PE ratio is 20.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.38x versus 0.48x for CPI Aerostructures. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.38x 14.76x $1B $51.4M CVUCPI Aerostructures0.48x 20.86x $15.4M -$1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or ESP?
Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 16.54%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2% beat Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's return on equity of 16.58%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations44.01% $0.42 $5.3B ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics28.62% $0.63 $46.3M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $65.72, signalling upside risk potential of 30.58%. On the other hand Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -38.85%. Given that Fortune Brands Innovations has higher upside potential than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics, analysts believe Fortune Brands Innovations is more attractive than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations6 11 0 ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or ESP More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Espey Manufacturing & Electronics has a beta of 0.063, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics offers a yield of 2.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Espey Manufacturing & Electronics pays out 28.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or ESP?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics quarterly revenues of $10.3M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M is higher than Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Espey Manufacturing & Electronics's PE ratio is 15.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.38x versus 2.36x for Espey Manufacturing & Electronics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.38x 14.76x $1B $51.4M ESPEspey Manufacturing & Electronics2.36x 15.25x $10.3M $1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GFF?
Griffon has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of 9.28%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2% beat Griffon's return on equity of 105.75%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations44.01% $0.42 $5.3B GFFGriffon41.23% $1.21 $1.8B -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GFF?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $65.72, signalling upside risk potential of 30.58%. On the other hand Griffon has an analysts' consensus of $96.71 which suggests that it could grow by 42.88%. Given that Griffon has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe Griffon is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations6 11 0 GFFGriffon6 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GFF More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Griffon has a beta of 1.153, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.327%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GFF?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Griffon offers a yield of 1.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Griffon pays out 17.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GFF?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Griffon quarterly revenues of $611.7M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M is lower than Griffon's net income of $56.8M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Griffon's PE ratio is 14.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.38x versus 1.27x for Griffon. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.38x 14.76x $1B $51.4M GFFGriffon1.27x 14.01x $611.7M $56.8M
-
Which has Higher Returns FBIN or GPUS?
Hyperscale Data has a net margin of 4.98% compared to Fortune Brands Innovations's net margin of -16.81%. Fortune Brands Innovations's return on equity of 18.2% beat Hyperscale Data's return on equity of -305.92%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FBINFortune Brands Innovations44.01% $0.42 $5.3B GPUSHyperscale Data21.11% -$0.98 $122.6M -
What do Analysts Say About FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a consensus price target of $65.72, signalling upside risk potential of 30.58%. On the other hand Hyperscale Data has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11692573.72%. Given that Hyperscale Data has higher upside potential than Fortune Brands Innovations, analysts believe Hyperscale Data is more attractive than Fortune Brands Innovations.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FBINFortune Brands Innovations6 11 0 GPUSHyperscale Data0 0 0 -
Is FBIN or GPUS More Risky?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a beta of 1.370, which suggesting that the stock is 37.028% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hyperscale Data has a beta of 4.535, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 353.454%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.95%. Hyperscale Data offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fortune Brands Innovations pays 25.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Hyperscale Data pays out -9.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Fortune Brands Innovations's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FBIN or GPUS?
Fortune Brands Innovations quarterly revenues are $1B, which are larger than Hyperscale Data quarterly revenues of $25M. Fortune Brands Innovations's net income of $51.4M is higher than Hyperscale Data's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Fortune Brands Innovations's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Hyperscale Data's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fortune Brands Innovations is 1.38x versus 0.10x for Hyperscale Data. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FBINFortune Brands Innovations1.38x 14.76x $1B $51.4M GPUSHyperscale Data0.10x -- $25M -$4.2M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Target’s Dividend Worth Buying?
Retail giant Target (NYSE:TGT) has been through an extremely volatile…
Where Will AST SpaceMobile Be In 5 Years?
Ever tried to send a text from the Nevada desert…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 48x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Alerts
Sell
11
VEON alert for Jun 16
VEON [VEON] is up 4.61% over the past day.
Buy
74
DAVE alert for Jun 16
Dave [DAVE] is up 3.92% over the past day.
Buy
54
DAR alert for Jun 16
Darling Ingredients [DAR] is up 7.19% over the past day.
