Is Apple Stock Undervalued or Overvalued?
For many years, Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) was just about the perfect…
Sell
20
MNR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.61
Seasonality move
:
0.1%
Day range:
$13.30 - $13.65
52-week range:
$12.40 - $20.94
Dividend yield:
20.67%
P/E ratio:
8.39x
P/S ratio:
1.44x
P/B ratio:
1.16x
Volume:
249.7K
Avg. volume:
262.8K
1-year change:
-30.05%
Market cap:
$1.6B
Revenue:
$969.6M
EPS (TTM):
$1.61
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$261.8M | $0.68 | -5.41% | 14.29% | $22.50 |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$221.5M | $0.22 | 63.01% | -- | $27.50 |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$79.3M | $0.05 | -18.3% | -81.82% | $3.47 |
|
SD
SandRidge Energy
|
$43.3M | $0.43 | 43.59% | 20.83% | $17.00 |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$823.8M | $1.62 | 24.11% | -32.84% | $38.36 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$13.50 | $22.50 | $1.6B | 8.39x | $0.79 | 20.67% | 1.44x |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$22.01 | $27.50 | $1.9B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.63x |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
$0.62 | -- | $9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.01x |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$0.79 | $3.47 | $163.2M | 2.19x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.45x |
|
SD
SandRidge Energy
|
$9.90 | $17.00 | $363.2M | 5.66x | $0.11 | 4.44% | 2.67x |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$23.83 | $38.36 | $2.7B | 3.34x | $0.20 | 3.27% | 0.93x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
100% | -0.262 | 25% | 0.58x |
|
BKV
BKV
|
11.89% | 0.000 | 11.24% | 0.35x |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
169.83% | 0.000 | 42.01% | 0.25x |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
34.43% | 0.939 | 193.7% | 0.38x |
|
SD
SandRidge Energy
|
-- | 0.685 | -- | 2.02x |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
38.42% | 1.369 | 80.13% | 0.47x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MNR
Mach Natural Resources LP
|
$62.5M | $51.7M | 48.14% | 28.43% | 14.9% | $91.1M |
|
BKV
BKV
|
$187.7M | $58.5M | -10.06% | -12.23% | -45.15% | -$34.8M |
|
NEHC
New Era Helium
|
-- | -$2.1M | -176.32% | -- | -575.31% | -$3.5M |
|
REI
Ring Energy
|
$31.3M | $22.4M | 5.67% | 8.47% | 25.46% | -$3.4M |
|
SD
SandRidge Energy
|
$18.6M | $14.7M | 14.64% | 14.64% | 34.54% | $13.6M |
|
SM
SM Energy
|
$344.6M | $293.5M | 12.99% | 20.29% | 32.92% | $54.2M |
Mach Natural Resources LP vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or BKV?
BKV has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -34.55%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat BKV's return on equity of -12.23%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M BKVBKV82.45% -$0.93 $1.7B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand BKV has an analysts' consensus of $27.50 which suggests that it could grow by 24.94%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than BKV, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than BKV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 BKVBKV7 0 0 -
Is MNR or BKV More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BKV has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.67%. BKV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. BKV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or BKV?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are smaller than BKV quarterly revenues of $227.7M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than BKV's net income of -$78.7M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while BKV's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.44x versus 2.63x for BKV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.44x 8.39x $226.8M $15.9M BKVBKV2.63x -- $227.7M -$78.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or NEHC?
New Era Helium has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of -1017.06%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M NEHCNew Era Helium-- -$0.24 $3.9M -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than New Era Helium.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 NEHCNew Era Helium0 0 0 -
Is MNR or NEHC More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.67%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or NEHC?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of $326.5K. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.44x versus 7.01x for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.44x 8.39x $226.8M $15.9M NEHCNew Era Helium7.01x -- $326.5K -$3.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or REI?
Ring Energy has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 11.52%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat Ring Energy's return on equity of 8.47%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M REIRing Energy39.58% $0.05 $1.3B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand Ring Energy has an analysts' consensus of $3.47 which suggests that it could grow by 339.24%. Given that Ring Energy has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe Ring Energy is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 REIRing Energy0 1 0 -
Is MNR or REI More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ring Energy has a beta of 0.915, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.456%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.67%. Ring Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Ring Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or REI?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than Ring Energy quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than Ring Energy's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while Ring Energy's PE ratio is 2.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.44x versus 0.45x for Ring Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.44x 8.39x $226.8M $15.9M REIRing Energy0.45x 2.19x $79.1M $9.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or SD?
SandRidge Energy has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 30.63%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat SandRidge Energy's return on equity of 14.64%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M SDSandRidge Energy43.59% $0.35 $464.9M -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or SD?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand SandRidge Energy has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 71.72%. Given that SandRidge Energy has higher upside potential than Mach Natural Resources LP, analysts believe SandRidge Energy is more attractive than Mach Natural Resources LP.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 SDSandRidge Energy1 0 0 -
Is MNR or SD More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SandRidge Energy has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.07%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or SD?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.67%. SandRidge Energy offers a yield of 4.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. SandRidge Energy pays out 114.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but SandRidge Energy's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or SD?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are larger than SandRidge Energy quarterly revenues of $42.6M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is higher than SandRidge Energy's net income of $13M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while SandRidge Energy's PE ratio is 5.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.44x versus 2.67x for SandRidge Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.44x 8.39x $226.8M $15.9M SDSandRidge Energy2.67x 5.66x $42.6M $13M
-
Which has Higher Returns MNR or SM?
SM Energy has a net margin of 7.01% compared to Mach Natural Resources LP's net margin of 21.71%. Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43% beat SM Energy's return on equity of 20.29%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MNRMach Natural Resources LP27.58% $0.14 $460M SMSM Energy41.05% $1.59 $7.2B -
What do Analysts Say About MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a consensus price target of $22.50, signalling upside risk potential of 66.67%. On the other hand SM Energy has an analysts' consensus of $38.36 which suggests that it could grow by 60.96%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than SM Energy, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than SM Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MNRMach Natural Resources LP4 0 0 SMSM Energy6 6 0 -
Is MNR or SM More Risky?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SM Energy has a beta of 2.173, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 117.291%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 20.67%. SM Energy offers a yield of 3.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Mach Natural Resources LP pays 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. SM Energy pays out 11.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MNR or SM?
Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues are $226.8M, which are smaller than SM Energy quarterly revenues of $839.6M. Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M is lower than SM Energy's net income of $182.3M. Notably, Mach Natural Resources LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.39x while SM Energy's PE ratio is 3.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mach Natural Resources LP is 1.44x versus 0.93x for SM Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MNRMach Natural Resources LP1.44x 8.39x $226.8M $15.9M SMSM Energy0.93x 3.34x $839.6M $182.3M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Where Will Palo Alto Networks Stock Be in 5 Years?
You know those companies that just refuse to slow down…
UPS Stock Forecast: Is the 6.9% Dividend Too Good to Be True?
Parcel delivery giant UPS (NYSE:UPS) has seen its fair share…
Stock Ideas
Buy
70
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 39x
Buy
68
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 46x
Sell
39
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Buy
84
SBET alert for May 28
SharpLink Gaming [SBET] is down 15.43% over the past day.
Buy
58
TNXP alert for May 28
Tonix Pharmaceuticals Holding [TNXP] is down 2.03% over the past day.
Sell
37
ATS alert for May 28
ATS [ATS] is down 1.27% over the past day.
