NEHC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 18.09%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 10.86%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $132.20 which suggests that it could grow by 24.67%. Given that Chord Energy has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Chord Energy is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 6.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Chord Energy's net income of $219.8M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 7.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 6.81x versus 1.13x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 14.11%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 7.85%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $19.25 which suggests that it could grow by 69.9%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $257.4M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $36.3M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 12.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 6.81x versus 1.40x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mach Natural Resources LP has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of 7.01%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Mach Natural Resources LP's return on equity of 28.43%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Mach Natural Resources LP has an analysts' consensus of $22.50 which suggests that it could grow by 56.03%. Given that Mach Natural Resources LP has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Mach Natural Resources LP is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mach Natural Resources LP has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mach Natural Resources LP offers a yield of 19.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP pays out 83.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Mach Natural Resources LP's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Mach Natural Resources LP quarterly revenues of $226.8M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Mach Natural Resources LP's net income of $15.9M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mach Natural Resources LP's PE ratio is 8.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 6.81x versus 1.54x for Mach Natural Resources LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Prairie Operating has a net margin of -1017.06% compared to New Era Helium's net margin of -19.26%. New Era Helium's return on equity of -- beat Prairie Operating's return on equity of -42.11%.

New Era Helium has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Prairie Operating has an analysts' consensus of $8.75 which suggests that it could grow by 119.85%. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than New Era Helium.

New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Prairie Operating has a beta of 2.020, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 102.024%.

New Era Helium has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Prairie Operating offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Era Helium pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Prairie Operating pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

New Era Helium quarterly revenues are $326.5K, which are smaller than Prairie Operating quarterly revenues of $13.6M. New Era Helium's net income of -$3.3M is lower than Prairie Operating's net income of -$2.6M. Notably, New Era Helium's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Prairie Operating's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Era Helium is 6.81x versus -- for Prairie Operating. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.