PROP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 15.53%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -- beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 14.36%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $180.14 which suggests that it could grow by 48.94%. Given that Chord Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe Chord Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.941, which suggesting that the stock is 94.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 8.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 48.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Chord Energy's net income of $225.3M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 6.22x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.26x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -- compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 18.39%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -- beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $22.75 which suggests that it could grow by 47.63%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.941, which suggesting that the stock is 94.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $271.6M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.76x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Era Helium has a net margin of -- compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of --. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -- beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than New Era Helium.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.941, which suggesting that the stock is 94.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of --. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of --. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus -- for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vivakor has a net margin of -- compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of -10.61%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -- beat Vivakor's return on equity of -60.36%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vivakor has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than Vivakor, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than Vivakor.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.941, which suggesting that the stock is 94.115% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vivakor has a beta of 0.734, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.556%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Vivakor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vivakor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Vivakor quarterly revenues of $15.9M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.4M is lower than Vivakor's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Vivakor's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 0.51x for Vivakor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.