LC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 5.36% compared to LendingClub's net margin of -1.97%. LendingClub's return on equity of 3.84% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -4.28%.

LendingClub has a consensus price target of $15.35, signalling upside risk potential of 46.75%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that LendingClub has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe LendingClub is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

LendingClub has a beta of 2.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.776, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.359%.

LendingClub has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingClub pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingClub quarterly revenues are $217.7M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $22.1M. LendingClub's net income of $11.7M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of -$434K. Notably, LendingClub's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub is 1.45x versus 2.73x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 5.36% compared to LendingClub's net margin of 36.31%. LendingClub's return on equity of 3.84% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

LendingClub has a consensus price target of $15.35, signalling upside risk potential of 46.75%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.38%. Given that LendingClub has higher upside potential than OptimumBank Holdings, analysts believe LendingClub is more attractive than OptimumBank Holdings.

LendingClub has a beta of 2.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.492, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.773%.

LendingClub has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. LendingClub pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

LendingClub quarterly revenues are $217.7M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. LendingClub's net income of $11.7M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, LendingClub's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub is 1.45x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 5.36% compared to LendingClub's net margin of 32.4%. LendingClub's return on equity of 3.84% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.97%.

LendingClub has a consensus price target of $15.35, signalling upside risk potential of 46.75%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.67 which suggests that it could grow by 8.41%. Given that LendingClub has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe LendingClub is more attractive than Park National.

LendingClub has a beta of 2.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.823, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.656%.

LendingClub has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park National offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. LendingClub pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LendingClub quarterly revenues are $217.7M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $130.1M. LendingClub's net income of $11.7M is lower than Park National's net income of $42.2M. Notably, LendingClub's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub is 1.45x versus 4.84x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 5.36% compared to LendingClub's net margin of 24.09%. LendingClub's return on equity of 3.84% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

LendingClub has a consensus price target of $15.35, signalling upside risk potential of 46.75%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 14.77%. Given that LendingClub has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe LendingClub is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

LendingClub has a beta of 2.410, which suggesting that the stock is 141.036% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.907, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.302%.

LendingClub has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. LendingClub pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

LendingClub quarterly revenues are $217.7M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. LendingClub's net income of $11.7M is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, LendingClub's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.77x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 12.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for LendingClub is 1.45x versus 2.96x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.