PRK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 32.4% compared to Park National's net margin of 27.38%. Park National's return on equity of 12.97% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $169.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.96%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.76%. Given that Bar Harbor Bankshares has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Bar Harbor Bankshares is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.687, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.289%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. Park National's net income of $42.2M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.69x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.00x versus 2.96x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 32.4% compared to Park National's net margin of -1.97%. Park National's return on equity of 12.97% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -4.28%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $169.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.96%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Park National has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.759, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.118%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $22.1M. Park National's net income of $42.2M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of -$434K. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.69x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.00x versus 2.85x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

OptimumBank Holdings has a net margin of 32.4% compared to Park National's net margin of 36.31%. Park National's return on equity of 12.97% beat OptimumBank Holdings's return on equity of 15.42%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $169.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.96%. On the other hand OptimumBank Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 13.64%. Given that OptimumBank Holdings has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe OptimumBank Holdings is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OptimumBank Holdings has a beta of 0.455, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.491%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. OptimumBank Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. OptimumBank Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are larger than OptimumBank Holdings quarterly revenues of $10.7M. Park National's net income of $42.2M is higher than OptimumBank Holdings's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.69x while OptimumBank Holdings's PE ratio is 3.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.00x versus 1.18x for OptimumBank Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 32.4% compared to Park National's net margin of 24.09%. Park National's return on equity of 12.97% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.46%.

Park National has a consensus price target of $169.00, signalling upside risk potential of 3.96%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $72.50 which suggests that it could grow by 18.08%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Park National.

Park National has a beta of 0.786, which suggesting that the stock is 21.434% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.888, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.218%.

Park National has a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.62%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Park National pays 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Park National quarterly revenues are $130.1M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $81.7M. Park National's net income of $42.2M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Park National's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.69x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Park National is 5.00x versus 2.88x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.