HUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Chemours has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -1.8%. Huntsman's return on equity of -3.46% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 10.59%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $22.38, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $23.78 which suggests that it could grow by 32.84%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than The Chemours, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than The Chemours.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.828, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 82.775%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. The Chemours offers a yield of 5.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Huntsman pays 167.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out -62.61% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Huntsman's net income of -$33M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$27M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chemours's PE ratio is 36.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.47x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -5.3%. Huntsman's return on equity of -3.46% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -6.03%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $22.38, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $13.45 which suggests that it could grow by 37.96%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.971, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.089%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays 167.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Huntsman's net income of -$33M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$242M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 1.61%. Huntsman's return on equity of -3.46% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $22.38, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.09%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.350, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.032%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Huntsman pays 167.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Huntsman's net income of -$33M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of -2.14% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 4.35%. Huntsman's return on equity of -3.46% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 3.06%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $22.38, signalling upside risk potential of 35.58%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $32.77 which suggests that it could grow by 32.78%. Given that Huntsman has higher upside potential than The Mosaic, analysts believe Huntsman is more attractive than The Mosaic.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.974, which suggesting that the stock is 2.613% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.838%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.06%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Huntsman pays 167.33% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 30.18% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Huntsman's is not.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Huntsman's net income of -$33M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $122.2M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 21.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.70x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.