HUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avient has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 6.47%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Avient's return on equity of 7.23%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.5%. On the other hand Avient has an analysts' consensus of $54.14 which suggests that it could grow by 37.11%. Given that Avient has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Avient is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avient has a beta of 1.430, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.042%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Avient offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Avient pays out 55.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Avient's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than Avient quarterly revenues of $746.5M. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than Avient's net income of $48.3M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Avient's PE ratio is 21.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 1.12x for Avient. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Chemours has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -0.57%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat The Chemours's return on equity of 12.49%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.5%. On the other hand The Chemours has an analysts' consensus of $22.20 which suggests that it could grow by 62.04%. Given that The Chemours has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Chemours is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Chemours has a beta of 1.997, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.698%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. The Chemours offers a yield of 7.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. The Chemours pays out 172.09% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are larger than The Chemours quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than The Chemours's net income of -$8M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Chemours's PE ratio is 24.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.36x for The Chemours. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of -10.34%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.5%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.33%. Given that Cleveland-Cliffs has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe Cleveland-Cliffs is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Mosaic has a net margin of -9.71% compared to Huntsman's net margin of 6%. Huntsman's return on equity of -5.65% beat The Mosaic's return on equity of 1.46%.

Huntsman has a consensus price target of $20.23, signalling upside risk potential of 19.5%. On the other hand The Mosaic has an analysts' consensus of $31.99 which suggests that it could grow by 27.64%. Given that The Mosaic has higher upside potential than Huntsman, analysts believe The Mosaic is more attractive than Huntsman.

Huntsman has a beta of 0.956, which suggesting that the stock is 4.436% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Mosaic has a beta of 1.345, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.465%.

Huntsman has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.91%. The Mosaic offers a yield of 3.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Huntsman pays -92.06% of its earnings as a dividend. The Mosaic pays out 154.77% of its earnings as a dividend.

Huntsman quarterly revenues are $1.5B, which are smaller than The Mosaic quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Huntsman's net income of -$141M is lower than The Mosaic's net income of $169M. Notably, Huntsman's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Mosaic's PE ratio is 45.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Huntsman is 0.48x versus 0.72x for The Mosaic. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.