FOUR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NCR Atleos has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 2.23%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat NCR Atleos's return on equity of -12.83%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 12.52%. On the other hand NCR Atleos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.23%. Given that NCR Atleos has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe NCR Atleos is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Atleos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Atleos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Atleos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are smaller than NCR Atleos quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than NCR Atleos's net income of $24M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.90x while NCR Atleos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.42x versus 0.58x for NCR Atleos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Priority Technology Holdings has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.67%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 12.52%. On the other hand Priority Technology Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.668%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Priority Technology Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Priority Technology Holdings pays out -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are larger than Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues of $227M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.90x while Priority Technology Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.42x versus 1.02x for Priority Technology Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Repay Holdings has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.1%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 12.52%. On the other hand Repay Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.41 which suggests that it could grow by 47.4%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Shift4 Payments, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Shift4 Payments.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.492%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Repay Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Repay Holdings pays out -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are larger than Repay Holdings quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is higher than Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.90x while Repay Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.42x versus 2.35x for Repay Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Block has a net margin of 5.92% compared to Shift4 Payments's net margin of 4.75%. Shift4 Payments's return on equity of 14.76% beat Block's return on equity of 5.56%.

Shift4 Payments has a consensus price target of $117.81, signalling upside risk potential of 12.52%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $97.11 which suggests that it could grow by 9.15%. Given that Shift4 Payments has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Shift4 Payments is more attractive than Block.

Shift4 Payments has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.791%.

Shift4 Payments has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Shift4 Payments pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Shift4 Payments quarterly revenues are $909.2M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. Shift4 Payments's net income of $53.8M is lower than Block's net income of $283.8M. Notably, Shift4 Payments's price-to-earnings ratio is 56.90x while Block's PE ratio is 53.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Shift4 Payments is 2.42x versus 2.37x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.