PRTH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Inuvo has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of -9.14%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Inuvo's return on equity of -54%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand Inuvo has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 93.88%. Given that Inuvo has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe Inuvo is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Inuvo has a beta of 1.201, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.116%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Inuvo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Inuvo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $227M, which are larger than Inuvo quarterly revenues of $22.4M. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M is higher than Inuvo's net income of -$2M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Inuvo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 1.02x versus 0.87x for Inuvo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NCR Atleos has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of 2.23%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat NCR Atleos's return on equity of -12.83%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand NCR Atleos has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.23%. Given that NCR Atleos has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe NCR Atleos is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NCR Atleos has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NCR Atleos offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend. NCR Atleos pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $227M, which are smaller than NCR Atleos quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M is lower than NCR Atleos's net income of $24M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NCR Atleos's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 1.02x versus 0.58x for NCR Atleos. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Repay Holdings has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of 4.1%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Repay Holdings's return on equity of -9.53%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand Repay Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $11.41 which suggests that it could grow by 47.4%. Given that Repay Holdings has higher upside potential than Priority Technology Holdings, analysts believe Repay Holdings is more attractive than Priority Technology Holdings.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Repay Holdings has a beta of 1.425, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.492%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Repay Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Repay Holdings pays out -3.19% of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $227M, which are larger than Repay Holdings quarterly revenues of $79.1M. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M is higher than Repay Holdings's net income of $3.2M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Repay Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 1.02x versus 2.35x for Repay Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Block has a net margin of 4.67% compared to Priority Technology Holdings's net margin of 4.75%. Priority Technology Holdings's return on equity of 36.63% beat Block's return on equity of 5.56%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.51%. On the other hand Block has an analysts' consensus of $97.11 which suggests that it could grow by 9.15%. Given that Priority Technology Holdings has higher upside potential than Block, analysts believe Priority Technology Holdings is more attractive than Block.

Priority Technology Holdings has a beta of 1.197, which suggesting that the stock is 19.668% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Block has a beta of 2.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.791%.

Priority Technology Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Block offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Priority Technology Holdings pays -1885.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Block pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Priority Technology Holdings quarterly revenues are $227M, which are smaller than Block quarterly revenues of $6B. Priority Technology Holdings's net income of $10.6M is lower than Block's net income of $283.8M. Notably, Priority Technology Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Block's PE ratio is 53.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Priority Technology Holdings is 1.02x versus 2.37x for Block. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.