FLO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mission Produce has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 4.88%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat Mission Produce's return on equity of 6.72%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.36%. On the other hand Mission Produce has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 36.22%. Given that Mission Produce has higher upside potential than Flowers Foods, analysts believe Mission Produce is more attractive than Flowers Foods.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.386, which suggesting that the stock is 61.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mission Produce has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Mission Produce offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Mission Produce pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Mission Produce quarterly revenues of $354.4M. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is higher than Mission Produce's net income of $17.3M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while Mission Produce's PE ratio is 24.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.83x versus 0.72x for Mission Produce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

McCormick & has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 13.28%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat McCormick &'s return on equity of 15.12%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.36%. On the other hand McCormick & has an analysts' consensus of $85.16 which suggests that it could grow by 14.27%. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than McCormick &.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.386, which suggesting that the stock is 61.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.513%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. McCormick & offers a yield of 2.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick & pays out 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than McCormick & quarterly revenues of $1.7B. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is lower than McCormick &'s net income of $223.1M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while McCormick &'s PE ratio is 25.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.83x versus 3.01x for McCormick &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RegalWorks Media has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of --. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat RegalWorks Media's return on equity of --.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.36%. On the other hand RegalWorks Media has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than RegalWorks Media, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than RegalWorks Media.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.386, which suggesting that the stock is 61.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RegalWorks Media has a beta of 0.206, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.378%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. RegalWorks Media offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. RegalWorks Media pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than RegalWorks Media quarterly revenues of --. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is higher than RegalWorks Media's net income of --. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while RegalWorks Media's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.83x versus -- for RegalWorks Media. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 5.46% compared to Flowers Foods's net margin of 3.7%. Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

Flowers Foods has a consensus price target of $24.00, signalling upside risk potential of 20.36%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $104.38 which suggests that it could grow by 23.11%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than Flowers Foods, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than Flowers Foods.

Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.386, which suggesting that the stock is 61.353% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

Flowers Foods has a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share corresponding to a yield of 4.76%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Flowers Foods pays 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

Flowers Foods quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. Flowers Foods's net income of $65M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, Flowers Foods's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.50x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Flowers Foods is 0.83x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.