MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Flowers Foods has a net margin of 13.28% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 5.46%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 15.12% beat Flowers Foods's return on equity of 17.46%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $85.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.27%. On the other hand Flowers Foods has an analysts' consensus of $24.00 which suggests that it could grow by 20.36%. Given that Flowers Foods has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Flowers Foods is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.386, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.353%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Flowers Foods offers a yield of 4.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowers Foods pays out 158.18% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Flowers Foods's is not.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Flowers Foods quarterly revenues of $1.2B. McCormick &'s net income of $223.1M is higher than Flowers Foods's net income of $65M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Flowers Foods's PE ratio is 17.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.01x versus 0.83x for Flowers Foods. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ingredion has a net margin of 13.28% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 10.05%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 15.12% beat Ingredion's return on equity of 18.21%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $85.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.27%. On the other hand Ingredion has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.59%. Given that Ingredion has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Ingredion is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingredion has a beta of 0.747, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.339%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Ingredion offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.80 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingredion pays out 30.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Ingredion quarterly revenues of $1.9B. McCormick &'s net income of $223.1M is higher than Ingredion's net income of $188M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Ingredion's PE ratio is 13.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.01x versus 1.18x for Ingredion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mondelez International has a net margin of 13.28% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 9.27%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 15.12% beat Mondelez International's return on equity of 13.53%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $85.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.27%. On the other hand Mondelez International has an analysts' consensus of $76.64 which suggests that it could grow by 31.49%. Given that Mondelez International has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Mondelez International is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mondelez International has a beta of 0.539, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.116%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Mondelez International offers a yield of 3.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Mondelez International pays out 43.56% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than Mondelez International quarterly revenues of $9.2B. McCormick &'s net income of $223.1M is lower than Mondelez International's net income of $853M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Mondelez International's PE ratio is 20.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.01x versus 2.18x for Mondelez International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 13.28% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 3.7%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 15.12% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 5.52%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $85.16, signalling upside risk potential of 14.27%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $104.38 which suggests that it could grow by 23.11%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.755, which suggesting that the stock is 24.513% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 1.205, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.502%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.3%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 2.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 61.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $773.7M. McCormick &'s net income of $223.1M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $28.6M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.35x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 20.78x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 3.01x versus 0.87x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.