MKC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Dollar Tree has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 7.4%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Dollar Tree's return on equity of -49.43%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.34, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Dollar Tree has an analysts' consensus of $95.66 which suggests that it could grow by 0.49%. Given that McCormick & has higher upside potential than Dollar Tree, analysts believe McCormick & is more attractive than Dollar Tree.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dollar Tree has a beta of 0.839, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.146%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Dollar Tree offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Dollar Tree pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Dollar Tree quarterly revenues of $4.6B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than Dollar Tree's net income of $343.4M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while Dollar Tree's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.97x versus 1.40x for Dollar Tree. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Kraft Heinz has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 11.87%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat The Kraft Heinz's return on equity of 5.39%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.34, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand The Kraft Heinz has an analysts' consensus of $31.48 which suggests that it could grow by 20.71%. Given that The Kraft Heinz has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe The Kraft Heinz is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Kraft Heinz has a beta of 0.267, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.273%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. The Kraft Heinz offers a yield of 6.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. The Kraft Heinz pays out 70.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than The Kraft Heinz quarterly revenues of $6B. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is lower than The Kraft Heinz's net income of $712M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while The Kraft Heinz's PE ratio is 11.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.97x versus 1.24x for The Kraft Heinz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Spectrum Brands Holdings has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 0.13%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Spectrum Brands Holdings's return on equity of 2.84%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.34, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Spectrum Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $83.57 which suggests that it could grow by 61.55%. Given that Spectrum Brands Holdings has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Spectrum Brands Holdings is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Spectrum Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.933, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.666%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Spectrum Brands Holdings offers a yield of 3.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Spectrum Brands Holdings pays out 40.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Spectrum Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $675.7M. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than Spectrum Brands Holdings's net income of $900K. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while Spectrum Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 24.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.97x versus 0.49x for Spectrum Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Utz Brands has a net margin of 10.11% compared to McCormick &'s net margin of 2.13%. McCormick &'s return on equity of 14.63% beat Utz Brands's return on equity of 1.98%.

McCormick & has a consensus price target of $82.34, signalling upside risk potential of 11.26%. On the other hand Utz Brands has an analysts' consensus of $17.25 which suggests that it could grow by 31.58%. Given that Utz Brands has higher upside potential than McCormick &, analysts believe Utz Brands is more attractive than McCormick &.

McCormick & has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 32.029% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Utz Brands has a beta of 1.182, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.19%.

McCormick & has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.35%. Utz Brands offers a yield of 1.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. McCormick & pays 57.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Utz Brands pays out 136% of its earnings as a dividend. McCormick &'s payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Utz Brands's is not.

McCormick & quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than Utz Brands quarterly revenues of $352.1M. McCormick &'s net income of $162.3M is higher than Utz Brands's net income of $7.5M. Notably, McCormick &'s price-to-earnings ratio is 25.43x while Utz Brands's PE ratio is 40.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for McCormick & is 2.97x versus 0.79x for Utz Brands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.