ESTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Salesforce has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 17.09%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Salesforce's return on equity of 10.45%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $124.02, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Salesforce has an analysts' consensus of $361.98 which suggests that it could grow by 31.14%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Salesforce, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Salesforce.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Salesforce has a beta of 1.418, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.813%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Salesforce offers a yield of 0.59% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce pays out 24.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Salesforce's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Salesforce quarterly revenues of $10B. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Salesforce's net income of $1.7B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Salesforce's PE ratio is 43.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.72x versus 7.09x for Salesforce. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Datadog has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 3.24%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Datadog's return on equity of 6.44%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $124.02, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Datadog has an analysts' consensus of $135.55 which suggests that it could grow by 16.56%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Datadog, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Datadog.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Datadog has a beta of 1.119, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.945%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Datadog offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Datadog pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Datadog quarterly revenues of $761.6M. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Datadog's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Datadog's PE ratio is 252.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.72x versus 14.77x for Datadog. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of 36.86%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 33.7%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $124.02, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $509.92 which suggests that it could grow by 11.49%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Microsoft.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.989, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.148%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $70.1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $25.8B. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 35.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.72x versus 12.65x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Snowflake has a net margin of -4.46% compared to Elastic NV's net margin of -41.27%. Elastic NV's return on equity of -17.14% beat Snowflake's return on equity of -40.99%.

Elastic NV has a consensus price target of $124.02, signalling upside risk potential of 34.26%. On the other hand Snowflake has an analysts' consensus of $220.69 which suggests that it could grow by 7.97%. Given that Elastic NV has higher upside potential than Snowflake, analysts believe Elastic NV is more attractive than Snowflake.

Elastic NV has a beta of 1.198, which suggesting that the stock is 19.767% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Snowflake has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Elastic NV has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Snowflake offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elastic NV pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Snowflake pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Elastic NV quarterly revenues are $382.1M, which are smaller than Snowflake quarterly revenues of $1B. Elastic NV's net income of -$17.1M is higher than Snowflake's net income of -$430.1M. Notably, Elastic NV's price-to-earnings ratio is 184.15x while Snowflake's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elastic NV is 6.72x versus 17.70x for Snowflake. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.