CWAN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enfusion has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 0.23%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Enfusion's return on equity of 3.17%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Enfusion has an analysts' consensus of $10.93 which suggests that it could fall by -1.82%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Enfusion.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enfusion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enfusion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are larger than Enfusion quarterly revenues of $52.9M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Enfusion's net income of $121K. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while Enfusion's PE ratio is 371.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.87x versus 6.60x for Enfusion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Freshworks has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -11.26%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Freshworks's return on equity of -8.61%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Freshworks has an analysts' consensus of $21.41 which suggests that it could grow by 30.16%. Given that Freshworks has higher upside potential than Clearwater Analytics Holdings, analysts believe Freshworks is more attractive than Clearwater Analytics Holdings.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Freshworks has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Freshworks offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Freshworks pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are smaller than Freshworks quarterly revenues of $194.6M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Freshworks's net income of -$21.9M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while Freshworks's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.87x versus 6.87x for Freshworks. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Jack Henry & Associates has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of 17.05%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Jack Henry & Associates's return on equity of 21.91%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Jack Henry & Associates has an analysts' consensus of $190.05 which suggests that it could grow by 8.74%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Jack Henry & Associates, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Jack Henry & Associates.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack Henry & Associates has a beta of 0.654, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.606%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jack Henry & Associates offers a yield of 1.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.58 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates pays out 40.83% of its earnings as a dividend. Jack Henry & Associates's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are smaller than Jack Henry & Associates quarterly revenues of $573.8M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Jack Henry & Associates's net income of $97.8M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while Jack Henry & Associates's PE ratio is 31.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.87x versus 5.62x for Jack Henry & Associates. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marqeta has a net margin of 3.13% compared to Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net margin of -19.97%. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's return on equity of 77.77% beat Marqeta's return on equity of 2.36%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a consensus price target of $35.78, signalling upside risk potential of 29.63%. On the other hand Marqeta has an analysts' consensus of $5.13 which suggests that it could grow by 16.21%. Given that Clearwater Analytics Holdings has higher upside potential than Marqeta, analysts believe Clearwater Analytics Holdings is more attractive than Marqeta.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marqeta has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Marqeta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Clearwater Analytics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Marqeta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Clearwater Analytics Holdings quarterly revenues are $126.5M, which are smaller than Marqeta quarterly revenues of $135.8M. Clearwater Analytics Holdings's net income of $419.3M is higher than Marqeta's net income of -$27.1M. Notably, Clearwater Analytics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.65x while Marqeta's PE ratio is 88.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Clearwater Analytics Holdings is 15.87x versus 4.47x for Marqeta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.