ENFN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Castellum has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Enfusion's net margin of -11.03%. Enfusion's return on equity of 3.97% beat Castellum's return on equity of -74.03%.

Enfusion has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand Castellum has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -4.17%. Given that Castellum has more downside risk than Enfusion, analysts believe Enfusion is more attractive than Castellum.

Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Castellum has a beta of -2.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 395.117%.

Enfusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Castellum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enfusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Castellum pays out -0.66% of its earnings as a dividend.

Enfusion quarterly revenues are $51.2M, which are larger than Castellum quarterly revenues of $11.6M. Enfusion's net income of $1.4M is higher than Castellum's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Enfusion's price-to-earnings ratio is 254.00x while Castellum's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enfusion is 6.18x versus 1.43x for Castellum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DigitalOcean Holdings has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Enfusion's net margin of 16.6%. Enfusion's return on equity of 3.97% beat DigitalOcean Holdings's return on equity of --.

Enfusion has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand DigitalOcean Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 16.6%. Given that DigitalOcean Holdings has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe DigitalOcean Holdings is more attractive than Enfusion.

Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DigitalOcean Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enfusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DigitalOcean Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enfusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DigitalOcean Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enfusion quarterly revenues are $51.2M, which are smaller than DigitalOcean Holdings quarterly revenues of $198.5M. Enfusion's net income of $1.4M is lower than DigitalOcean Holdings's net income of $32.9M. Notably, Enfusion's price-to-earnings ratio is 254.00x while DigitalOcean Holdings's PE ratio is 41.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enfusion is 6.18x versus 4.42x for DigitalOcean Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

F5 has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Enfusion's net margin of 22.14%. Enfusion's return on equity of 3.97% beat F5's return on equity of 19.23%.

Enfusion has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand F5 has an analysts' consensus of $242.86 which suggests that it could fall by -5.61%. Given that F5 has more downside risk than Enfusion, analysts believe Enfusion is more attractive than F5.

Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison F5 has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.653%.

Enfusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. F5 offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enfusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. F5 pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enfusion quarterly revenues are $51.2M, which are smaller than F5 quarterly revenues of $746.7M. Enfusion's net income of $1.4M is lower than F5's net income of $165.3M. Notably, Enfusion's price-to-earnings ratio is 254.00x while F5's PE ratio is 26.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enfusion is 6.18x versus 5.42x for F5. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Klaviyo has a net margin of 2.77% compared to Enfusion's net margin of -0.57%. Enfusion's return on equity of 3.97% beat Klaviyo's return on equity of -4.78%.

Enfusion has a consensus price target of $9.89, signalling downside risk potential of -2.63%. On the other hand Klaviyo has an analysts' consensus of $43.20 which suggests that it could grow by 3.55%. Given that Klaviyo has higher upside potential than Enfusion, analysts believe Klaviyo is more attractive than Enfusion.

Enfusion has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Klaviyo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enfusion has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Klaviyo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enfusion pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Klaviyo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Enfusion quarterly revenues are $51.2M, which are smaller than Klaviyo quarterly revenues of $235.1M. Enfusion's net income of $1.4M is higher than Klaviyo's net income of -$1.3M. Notably, Enfusion's price-to-earnings ratio is 254.00x while Klaviyo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enfusion is 6.18x versus 12.65x for Klaviyo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.